Integrated oncological treatment decision-making: Creating a practice of patient-centred decision-making.

The growing burden of cancer, with its costly and difficult to endure therapies, underscores the urgent need for individualized care that enhances patients' quality of life. Effective individualized treatment planning requires collaboration between healthcare professionals and patients (and their relatives), focusing on patients' personal values and preferences through shared decision-making. In practice, oncology care predominantly follows clinical guidelines, which, while reducing practice variation, may not account for individual patient differences in health status and preferences.

Opioid deprescribing: Qualitative perspectives from those with chronic non-cancer pain.

Aim: Deprescribing is the systematic process of discontinuing medications when the harms outweigh the benefits. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators in people with chronic non-cancer pain when deprescribing opioid analgesics, and their views on resources that assist with deprescribing.

Methods: A purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit 19 adults with chronic non-cancer pain from the community who were, or had been, on long-term opioid therapy.

The implementation of a decision aid for women with early-stage breast cancer considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A pilot study.

Objective: Despite little survival benefit and potential for harm, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates are increasing amongst early-stage breast cancer patients at low contralateral breast cancer risk. We developed a CPM decision aid (DA) and conducted a pilot implementation.

Methods: Surgeons and oncologists recruited eligible patients considering CPM.

Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy.

Objective: To investigate 1) younger (< 65) and older (> 65) adults' preference for and understanding of graph formats presenting risk information, and 2) the contribution of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy in understanding information.

Materials And Methods: To assess preferences, participants (n = 219 < 65 and n = 227>65) were exposed to a storyboard presenting six types of graphs. Understanding (verbatim and gist knowledge) was assessed in an experiment using a 6 (graphs: clock, bar, sparkplug, table, pie vs pictograph) by 2 (age: younger [<65] vs older [>65]) between-subjects design.