7 results match your criteria: "and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center[Affiliation]"
J Am Acad Orthop Surg
January 2025
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr. Zastrow, Dr. Levin), Washington Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Washington, DC (Dr. Rao), and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY (Dr. Morris).
Introduction: Bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) is characterized by hypoxia, hypotension, and cardiovascular compromise during cementation in arthroplasty cases. This study examines the association between anesthetic regimen and risk of BCIS in cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures. We hypothesized that neuraxial anesthesia would be associated with markedly lower BCIS incidence compared with general anesthesia alone or in combination with regional anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Acad Orthop Surg
June 2024
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Canada (Bozzo), the Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Canada (Tsui), the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Canada (Bhatnagar), and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Forsberg).
This review article focuses on the applications of deep learning with neural networks and multimodal neural networks in the orthopaedic domain. By providing practical examples of how artificial intelligence (AI) is being applied successfully in orthopaedic surgery, particularly in the realm of imaging data sets and the integration of clinical data, this study aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons with the necessary tools to not only evaluate existing literature but also to consider AI's potential in their own clinical or research pursuits. We first review standard deep neural networks which can analyze numerical clinical variables, then describe convolutional neural networks which can analyze image data, and then introduce multimodal AI models which analyze various types of different data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Engl J Med
October 2019
From the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London (J.L.), and the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Oncology Institute of Veneto IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.F.F.), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.), the Immunotherapy and Somatic Cell Therapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola (M.G.), and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital, Siena (M.M.) - all in Italy; the University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora (R.G.); Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille Hôpital Timone, Marseille (J.-J.G.), and Université de Paris, INSERM Unité 976, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology and Centres d'Investigation Clinique, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris (C.L.) - both in France; the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (C.D.L.); Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); the Department of Dermatology, University of Essen, Essen, and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg - both in Germany (D.S.); Universitäts Spital, Zurich, Switzerland (R.D.); Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB (M.S.), and the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (D.H.) - both in Canada; Tasman Oncology Research, Southport, QLD (A.H.), the Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW (M.S.C., G.V.L.), and the Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals (G.V.L.), Sydney, and the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC (G.M.) - all in Australia; General University Hospital Gregorio Marañon and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, Madrid (I.M.-R.); the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (J.H.); the Leuven Cancer Institute, Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (P.S.); University of California San Diego Health-La Jolla Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla (G.A.D.); the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark (L.B.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (J.I.R., A.B., A.M.); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (F.S.H.); and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (J.D.W.).
Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone resulted in longer progression-free and overall survival than ipilimumab alone in a trial involving patients with advanced melanoma. We now report 5-year outcomes in the trial.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma to receive one of the following regimens: nivolumab (at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks); nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab-matched placebo; or ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks for four doses) plus nivolumab-matched placebo.
Plast Reconstr Surg
June 2019
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Background: In choosing between implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction, surgeons and patients must weigh relative risks and benefits. However, differences in outcomes across procedure types may vary between unilateral versus bilateral reconstructions. Procedure-related differences in complications and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated for unilateral and bilateral reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Engl J Med
November 2015
From the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (T.K.C., P.W.K.); Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (B.E.); Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free NHS Trust, London (T.P.); Icon Cancer Care, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia (P.N.M.); Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (B.I.R.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (F.D.); Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (H.H.); Texas Oncology-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas (T.E.H.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) and Seoul National University Hospital (B.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Helsinki University Central Hospital Cancer Center, Helsinki (K.P.); Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (B.J.R.); Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto (G.A.B.), and Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB (D.Y.C.H.) - both in Canada; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary (L.G.); Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona (P.M.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (M.S.); Exelixis, South San Francisco, CA (A.B-H., C.H., C.S., G.M.S.); University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (N.M.T.); and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (R.J.M.).
Background: Cabozantinib is an oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) as well as MET and AXL, each of which has been implicated in the pathobiology of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma or in the development of resistance to antiangiogenic drugs. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib, as compared with everolimus, in patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy.
Methods: We randomly assigned 658 patients to receive cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg daily or everolimus at a dose of 10 mg daily.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci
September 1999
Research Animal Resource Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, RRL 1215, New York, NY 10021.