10 results match your criteria: "VA Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine[Affiliation]"

Lack of Effectiveness of Computer Aided Detection for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

May 2024

Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.

Article Synopsis
  • The systematic review analyzed the effects of computer-aided detection (CADe) in real-world colonoscopies, comparing it to standard procedures in nonrandomized studies.
  • Results showed no significant improvement in adenoma detection rates or mean adenomas per colonoscopy when CADe was used, indicating its limited effectiveness in practical settings.
  • The evidence for outcomes was rated as very low certainty, raising concerns about the reliability of findings from previously controlled randomized trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polyp Removal: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

April 2023

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Background And Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools aimed at improving polyp detection have been shown to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. However, it is unknown how increased polyp detection rates by AI affect the burden of patient surveillance after polyp removal.

Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials (5 in China, 2 in Italy, 1 in Japan, and 1 in the United States) comparing colonoscopy with or without AI detection aids.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Aims: Despite the significant advances made in the diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE), there is still a need for standardized definitions, appropriate recognition of endoscopic landmarks, and consistent use of classification systems. Current controversies in basic definitions of BE and the relative lack of anatomic knowledge are significant barriers to uniform documentation. We aimed to provide consensus-driven recommendations for uniform reporting and global application.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF