His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) typically is attempted with biventricular pacing (BiVP). One-third of patients are nonresponders. His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been evaluated as an alternative means of effecting CRT because it generates truly physiologic ventricular activation, as evidenced in part by the morphologic identity between normally conducted and paced QRS complexes.

Ventricular resynchronization by implementation of direct his bundle pacing in a patient with congenital complete AV block and newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy.

Congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) is usually due to failure of AV nodal conduction with preservation of the His Purkinje system, typically present at birth. While most patients with CCAVB ultimately require pacemaker therapy to restore physiologic heart rates, recent studies have suggested that chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with CCAVB can have detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, and may account for a 7-10% incidence of congestive heart failure in these patients. Since the His Purkinje system is preserved in CCAVB, this patient population could be uniquely well served by direct His bundle pacing (DHBP) which would be expected to restore physiologic activation of both ventricles.