12 results match your criteria: "University of Toronto Princess Margaret Cancer Centre[Affiliation]"
Background: Existing studies on osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) have primarily used cross-sectional data, assessing risk factors at a single time point. Determining the time-to-event profile of ORNJ has important implications to monitor oral health in head and neck cancer (HNC) long-term survivors.
Methods: Demographic, clinical and dosimetric data were retrospectively obtained for a clinical observational cohort of 1129 patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy (RT) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Can Urol Assoc J
December 2022
Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Adv Sci (Weinh)
December 2020
Nat Nanotechnol
September 2019
Nature Nanotechnology, London, UK.
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Nanotechnol
August 2019
Nature Nanotechnology, London, UK.
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Nanotechnol
July 2019
Nature Nanotechnology, London, UK.
World Neurosurg
November 2018
Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective modality in the treatment of brainstem metastases (BSM), radiation-induced toxicity remains a critical concern. To better understand how severe or life-threatening toxicity is affected by the location of lesions treated in the brainstem, a review of all available studies reporting SRS treatment for BSM was performed.
Methods: Twenty-nine retrospective studies investigating SRS for BSM were reviewed.
J Natl Cancer Inst
December 2018
Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Background: We used two models to simulate a proposed noninferiority trial of radiotherapy (RT) omission in low-risk invasive breast cancer to illustrate how modeling could be used to predict the trial's outcomes, inform trial design, and contribute to practice debates.
Methods: The proposed trial was a prospective randomized trial of no-RT vs RT in women age 40 to 74 years undergoing lumpectomy and endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, stage I breast cancer with an Oncotype DX score of 18 or lower. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free interval (RFI), including locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and breast cancer death.
J Clin Oncol
February 2018
Veda N. Giri, Karen E. Knudsen, William K. Kelly, Robert B. Den, Adam P. Dicker, Jean Hoffman-Censits, Mark D. Hurwitz, Colette Hyatt, Grace Lu-Yao, Mark J. Mann, James R. Mark, Peter A. McCue, Ronald E. Myers, Stephen C. Peiper, Edouard J. Trabulsi, and Leonard G. Gomella, Jefferson Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center; Justin E. Bekelman, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; S. Bruce Malkowicz, University of Pennsylvania; Elias Obeid and Robert Uzzo, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Gordon F. Schwartz, Foundation for Breast and Prostate Health, Philadelphia; Mark S. Shahin, Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, Abington, PA; Wassim Abida, Philip Kantoff, and Mark E. Robson, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Mitchell C. Benson, Columbia University, New York, NY; Gerald L. Andriole, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Chris H. Bangma, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Amie Blanco, and Matthew Cooperberg, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Christopher J. Kane, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Howard Sandler, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Howard R. Soule, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA; Arthur Burnett, William B. Isaacs, Christian P. Pavlovich, and Patrick C. Walsh, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Peter A. Pinto and Carol J. Weil, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; William J. Catalona and Edward Schaeffer, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Scott Eggener, Sarah M. Nielsen, and Donald J. Vander Griend, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Kathleen A. Cooney, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; David E. Crawford, University of Colorado, Aurora; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver; Wendy Poage, Prostate Conditions Education Council, Elizabeth, CO; Neil Fleshner, University of Toronto Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Matthew L. Freedman, Kevin R. Loughlin, and Timothy R. Rebbeck, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Freddie C. Hamdy, University of Oxford, Oxford, England; R. Jeffrey Karnes, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eric A. Klein, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; Robert Pilarski, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Martin M. Miner, Brown University, Providence, RI; Todd Morgan and Scott A. Tomlins, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Matt T. Rosenberg, Mid-Michigan Health Center, Jackson, MI; Judd W. Moul, Duke University, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; David F. Penson, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Daniel Petrylak and Brian Shuch, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Curtis A. Pettaway, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Ganesh V. Raj, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX; Oliver Sartor, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA; Neal D. Shore, Atlantic Urology Clinics/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; and Richard Wender, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
Purpose Guidelines are limited for genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCA). The goal of this conference was to develop an expert consensus-driven working framework for comprehensive genetic evaluation of inherited PCA in the multigene testing era addressing genetic counseling, testing, and genetically informed management. Methods An expert consensus conference was convened including key stakeholders to address genetic counseling and testing, PCA screening, and management informed by evidence review.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFuture Oncol
December 2017
Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto & Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z9, Canada.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book
February 2016
From the Department of Neuropathology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Meningiomas are the most frequently occurring intracranial tumors. They are characterized by a broad spectrum of histopathologic appearance. Molecular alterations driving meningioma development, which affect the NF2 gene, are found in roughly 50% of patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Oncol
January 2015
University of Toronto Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address:
Cancer is not one disease. Outcomes and endpoints in trials should incorporate the therapeutic modality and cancer type because these factors affect clinician and patient expectations. In this Review, we discuss how to: define the importance of endpoints; make endpoints understandable to patients; improve the use of patient-reported outcomes; advance endpoints to parallel changes in trial design and therapeutic interventions; and integrate these improvements into trials and practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF