7 results match your criteria: "University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595.[Affiliation]"
Lippincotts Prim Care Pract
December 1997
School of Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine of the School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595, USA.
J Fam Pract
June 1997
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595, USA.
Background: It is common practice to routinely screen pregnant women for gestational diabetes. The screening technique typically used is the 1-hour 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with a subsequent 3-hour 100-g OGTT for women whose 1-hour test was positive. This process can be both time-consuming and inconvenient for patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAntimicrob Agents Chemother
March 1997
School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595, USA.
The in vitro susceptibilities of Bartonella (Rochalimaea) henselae, B. quintana, B. elizabethae, Rickettsia akari, R.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Med Qual
September 1996
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595, USA.
The bulk of cervical cancer screening is performed by primary care providers; mostly nurses and physicians. The literature regarding the quality of this screening is largely described from three perspectives; clinical, laboratory, and public health. This article describes the primary care perspective regarding issues of quality in cervical cancer screening and suggests areas for improvement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Board Fam Pract
January 1995
Student Health Service, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595.
Mil Med
September 1994
Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7595.
The Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test was psychometrically useful in screening a sample of 560 reservists from a midwest general hospital unit. The most conservative estimate of alcohol abuse potential was 11.3%, with possibly 6.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF