The role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

The introduction of trastuzumab and other subsequent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies dramatically shifted the treatment landscape of HER2+ breast cancer, changing the natural history of the disease. There is no standard-of-care for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in third and later lines of treatment; however, continued use of anti-HER2 therapies is recommended. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target HER2 and other HER family receptors play a central role in this setting.

Bringing Onco-Innovation to Europe's Healthcare Systems: The Potential of Biomarker Testing, Real World Evidence, Tumour Agnostic Therapies to Empower Personalised Medicine.

Rapid and continuing advances in biomarker testing are not being matched by uptake in health systems, and this is hampering both patient care and innovation. It also risks costing health systems the opportunity to make their services more efficient and, over time, more economical. The potential that genomics has brought to biomarker testing in diagnosis, prediction and research is being realised, pre-eminently in many cancers, but also in an ever-wider range of conditions-notably testing in ovarian, breast, pancreatic and prostate cancers.

Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis.

Background: Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1, respectively,have shown efficacy against several types of cancer. Despite these results, only a small percentage of patients maintains a long-lasting effect. Even Ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, has demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in multiple tumor types.

ESMO Management and treatment adapted recommendations in the COVID-19 era: Breast Cancer.

The global preparedness and response to the rapid escalation to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2-related disease (COVID-19) to a pandemic proportion has demanded the formulation of a reliable, useful and evidence-based mechanism for health services prioritisation, to achieve the highest quality standards of care to all patients. The prioritisation of high value cancer interventions must be embedded in the agenda for the pandemic response, ensuring that no inconsistency or discrepancy emerge in the health planning processes.The aim of this work is to organise health interventions for breast cancer management and research in a tiered framework (high, medium, low value), formulating a scheme of prioritisation per clinical cogency and intrinsic value or magnitude of benefit.