Bridging genomics' greatest challenge: The diversity gap.

Achieving diverse representation in biomedical data is critical for healthcare equity. Failure to do so perpetuates health disparities and exacerbates biases that may harm patients with underrepresented ancestral backgrounds. We present a quantitative assessment of representation in datasets used across human genomics, including genome-wide association studies (GWASs), pharmacogenomics, clinical trials, and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing.

Genetic signature detected in T cell receptors from patients with severe COVID-19.

Characterization of host genetic factors contributing to COVID-19 severity promises advances on drug discovery to fight the disease. Most genetic analyses to date have identified genome-wide significant associations involving loss-of-function variants for immune response pathways. Despite accumulating evidence supporting a role for T cells in COVID-19 severity, no definitive genetic markers have been found to support an involvement of T cell responses.

Generalisation of genomic findings and applications of polygenic risk scores.

Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) (also known as polygenic scores, genetic risk scores or polygenic indexes) capture genetic contributions of a multitude of markers that characterise complex traits. Although their likely application to precision medicine remains to be established, promising advances have included their ability to stratify high risk individuals and targeted screening interventions. Current PRS have been mostly optimised for individuals of Northern European ancestries.

Addressing Ancestry and Sex Bias in Pharmacogenomics.

The association of an individual's genetic makeup with their response to drugs is referred to as pharmacogenomics. By understanding the relationship between genetic variants and drug efficacy or toxicity, we are able to optimize pharmacological therapy according to an individual's genotype. Pharmacogenomics research has historically suffered from bias and underrepresentation of people from certain ancestry groups and of the female sex.

Implementation of individualised polygenic risk score analysis: a test case of a family of four.

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been widely applied in research studies, showing how population groups can be stratified into risk categories for many common conditions. As healthcare systems consider applying PRS to keep their populations healthy, little work has been carried out demonstrating their implementation at an individual level.

Case Presentation: We performed a systematic curation of PRS sources from established data repositories, selecting 15 phenotypes, comprising an excess of 37 million SNPs related to cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic and autoimmune diseases.

Transferability of genetic risk scores in African populations.

The poor transferability of genetic risk scores (GRSs) derived from European ancestry data in diverse populations is a cause of concern. We set out to evaluate whether GRSs derived from data of African American individuals and multiancestry data perform better in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) compared to European ancestry-derived scores. Using summary statistics from the Million Veteran Program (MVP), we showed that GRSs derived from data of African American individuals enhance polygenic prediction of lipid traits in SSA compared to European and multiancestry scores.

The proteostasis network provides targets for neurodegeneration.

The production, quality control, and degradation of proteins are a tightly controlled process necessary for cell health. In order to regulate this process, cells rely upon a network of molecular chaperone proteins that bind misfolded proteins and help them fold correctly. In addition, some molecular chaperones can target terminally misfolded proteins for degradation.