7 results match your criteria: "UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine[Affiliation]"

BACKGROUNDWe previously demonstrated the safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab (SBRT+P) in patients with advanced solid tumors. This phase I clinical trial was expanded to study the safety of partial tumor irradiation (partial-Rx). We assessed irradiated local failure (LF) and clinical outcomes with correlations to biomarkers including CD8+ T cell radiomics score (RS) and circulating cytokines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mobilizing phospholipids on tumor plasma membrane implicates phosphatidylserine externalization blockade for cancer immunotherapy.

Cell Rep

November 2022

Tumor Microenvironment Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 5115 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address:

In "healthy" tumor cells, phosphatidylserine (PS) is predominately localized in the inner plasma membrane leaflet. During apoptosis, PS relocates to the outer leaflet. Herein, we established PS tumor models with tumor cells lacking PS flippase component CDC50A, constantly exposing PS but alive.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We propose a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based risk priority number (RPN) method in failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to overcome the shortcomings of traditional RPN-based FMEA. Our research group has previously published the FMEA to mitigate the failure modes (FMs) for the commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC. However, inter-relationships among FMs were observed in high ranked FMs due to a heavy reliance on imaging system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Currently it remains difficult to identify patients most likely to benefit from radiotherapy (RT) for ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS), thus leading to wide variation in practice patterns. The genomic risk assessment tool DCISionRT (PreludeDX) has been validated to prognosticate recurrence risk and predict RT benefit. We aimed to study the cost-effectiveness analysis comparing DCIS treatments based on DCISionRT testing to traditional clinicopathologic risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines support systemic therapy based on mutational status in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) reserved for oligoprogression. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the routine addition of SBRT to upfront therapy in stage IV NSCLC by mutational subgroup.

Materials And Methods: A Markov state transition model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing SBRT plus maintenance therapy with maintenance therapy alone for oligometastatic NSCLC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A National WestlawNext Database Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Radiation Oncology.

Fed Pract

February 2018

and are medical students and is a resident, all at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in Pennsylvania. is an Associate Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington School of Medicine, and University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, Washington. and are medical students at Rutgers New Jersey and Otolaryngology 2, Newark, New Jersey. is a resident, Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana. is a Clinical Instructor, Department of Neurological Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. is Professor and Vice Chairman of Clinical Affairs, Department of Radiation Oncology and Otolaryngology; and is a Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, both at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

Although litigation involving radiation oncologists was infrequent and most verdicts were in favor of defendants, many cases resulted from claims of excessive radiation, unnecessary radiation, and a failure to refer and/or order appropriate tests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF