40 results match your criteria: "UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention[Affiliation]"

Community Member and Stakeholder Perspectives on a Healthy Environment Initiative in North Carolina.

Prev Chronic Dis

August 2015

Department of Public Health Education, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, and Chronic Disease and Injury Section, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Introduction: The North Carolina Community Transformation Grant Project (NC-CTG) aimed to implement policy, system, and environmental strategies to promote healthy eating, active living, tobacco-free living, and clinical and community preventive services to advance health equity and reduce health disparities for the state's most vulnerable communities. This article presents findings from the Health Equity Collaborative Evaluation and Implementation Project, which assessed community and stakeholder perceptions of health equity for 3 NC-CTG strategies: farmers markets, shared use, and smoke-free multiunit housing.

Methods: In a triangulated qualitative evaluation, 6 photo elicitation (PE) sessions among 45 community members in 1 urban and 3 rural counties and key informant interviews among 22 stakeholders were conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Theatre-based interventions have been used in health promotion activities among young people to address HIV and sexual health. In this study, we explored the experience of undergraduate student performers participating in a theatre-based HIV prevention and sexual health education intervention for high school students in the USA. Undergraduate students enrolled in a credit-bearing course to learn about HIV and sexual health, participatory theatre and health education techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and food environment: a 20-year longitudinal latent class analysis among CARDIA participants.

Health Place

November 2014

Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA; Carolina Population Center, 137 East Franklin St. Campus Box 8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.

Cross-sectional studies suggest that neighborhood socioeconomic (SES) disadvantage is associated with obesogenic food environments. Yet, it is unknown how exposure to neighborhood SES patterning through adulthood corresponds to food environments that also change over time. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to classify participants in the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cancer care research in North Carolina: the state of the state.

N C Med J

October 2014

UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Cancer is the leading cause of death in North Carolina. This issue brief summarizes cancer statistics for the state; highlights important issues facing cancer patients, caregivers, providers, and policy makers; discusses the state's novel resources for cancer care research; and explores ways of managing this public health problem in order to improve outcomes for the people of North Carolina.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of distance to care and rural or urban residence on receipt of radiation therapy among North Carolina Medicare enrollees with breast cancer.

N C Med J

October 2014

Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System (ICISS), Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Background: Distance to oncology service providers and rurality may affect receipt of guideline-recommended radiation therapy (RT), but the extent to which these factors affect the care of Medicare-insured patients is unknown.

Methods: Using cancer registry data linked to Medicare claims from the Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System (ICISS), we identified all women aged 65 years or older who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III breast cancer from 2003 through 2005, who had Medicare claims through 2006, and who were clinically eligible for RT. We geocoded the address of each RT service provider's practice location and calculated the travel distance from each patient's residential address to the nearest RT provider.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: National guidelines suggest that women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer be considered for adjuvant endocrine treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Joint symptoms (arthralgia) are a common AI side-effect. There is a need for effective approaches to arthralgia management that enable survivors to remain on AI therapy while optimizing as pain-free a life as possible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study explored the criterion-related validity and test-retest reliability of the modified RESIDential Environment physical activity questionnaire and whether the instrument's validity varied by body mass index, education, race/ethnicity, or employment status.

Design: Validation study using baseline data collected for randomized trial of a weight loss intervention.

Methods: Participants recruited from health departments wore an ActiGraph accelerometer and self-reported non-occupational walking, moderate and vigorous physical activity on the modified RESIDential Environment questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Addressing rural health disparities through policy change in the stroke belt.

J Public Health Manag Pract

August 2014

Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina (Dr Jilcott Pitts); and Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (Mss Smith, Thayer, Drobka, and Miller and Dr Ammerman), and Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Keyserling), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Context: Obesity-prevention policies are needed, particularly in low-income rural areas of the southern United States, where obesity and chronic disease prevalence are high. In 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued the "Common Community Measures for Obesity Prevention" (COCOMO), a set of 24 recommended community-level obesity-prevention strategies.

Objective: A variety of stakeholders in Lenoir County, North Carolina, were surveyed and interviewed, ranking the winnability, defined as feasibility and acceptability, of each of the 24 COCOMO-recommended strategies based on local culture, infrastructure, funding, and community support.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Translation of a behavioral weight loss intervention for mid-life, low-income women in local health departments.

Obesity (Silver Spring)

September 2013

Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Objective: To translate a behavioral weight loss intervention for mid-life, low-income women in real world settings.

Design And Methods: In this pragmatic clinical trial, we randomly selected six North Carolina county health departments and trained their current staff to deliver a 16-session evidence-based behavioral weight loss intervention (special intervention, SI). SI weight loss outcomes were compared to a delayed intervention (DI) control group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The CTSA Community Engagement Consultative Service (CECS) is a national partnership designed to improve community engaged research (CEnR) through expert consultation. This report assesses the feasibility of CECS and presents findings from 2008 to 2009.

Methodology: A coordinating center and five regional coordinating sites managed the service.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exploratory validation of the Fruit and Vegetable Neophobia Instrument among third- to fifth-grade students.

Appetite

January 2013

UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, CB 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

Children's unwillingness to try new foods, or food neophobia, may impact dietary behaviors. As part of an effort to evaluate Farm to School programs, the Fruit and Vegetable Neophobia Instrument (FVNI) was developed to measure student attitudes toward new fruits and vegetables. A self-administered, paper/pencil, 18-item questionnaire, the FVNI was adapted from the Food Neophobia Scale.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Socioeconomic status (SES) and income disparity are strong predictors of health, and health promotion interventions that address them are more likely to be meaningful to participants and to sustain positive effects. Seeds of HOPE is an innovative project that is the result of a long-standing collaboration between the University of North Carolina (UNC) Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Research Center, and communities in rural North Carolina. Initial formative work, including key informant interviews, community surveys, and focus groups, strengthened our understanding of the link between hope and health and the importance of addressing social and economic issues as part of our health promotion interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF