7 results match your criteria: "UCLA Rehabilitation Center[Affiliation]"

Effects of tibiofemoral compression on ACL forces and knee kinematics under combined knee loads.

J Orthop Res

March 2019

UCLA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Biomechanics Research Section, UCLA Rehabilitation Center, 1000 Veteran Ave., Room 21-67, Los Angeles, California, 90095-1759.

Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can occur during landing from a jump or changing direction during a cutting maneuver. In these instances, the knee is subjected to combined forces and moments as it flexes under tibiofemoral compression force (TCF). We hypothesized that TCF would increase ACL forces and tibiofemoral motions under isolated and combined modes of loading relevant to knee injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prediction of ACL Force Produced by Tibiofemoral Compression During Controlled Knee Flexion: A New Robotic Testing Methodology.

J Biomech Eng

July 2018

UCLA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Biomechanics Research Section, 1000 Veteran Ave., UCLA Rehabilitation Center, Room 21-67, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1759.

Tibiofemoral compression force (TCF) is an important component of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. A new robotic testing methodology was utilized to predict ACL forces generated by TCF without loading the ligament. We hypothesized that ACL force, directly recorded by a miniature load cell during an unconstrained test, could be predicted by measurements of anterior tibial restraining force (ARF) recorded during a constrained test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It is currently unknown if preconditioning an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft prior to fixation is helpful in eliminating possible increases in anterior knee laxity. The purpose of this study was to measure cyclic increases in anterior tibial translation of four commonly used graft tissues subjected to four preconditioning protocols.

Methods: A robotic system was used to apply 250 cycles of anteroposterior force (134 N of anterior force followed by 134 N of posterior force) to ten intact knees (ACL controls) and then to a single knee reconstructed, for separate tests, with bone-patellar tendon-bone, bone-Achilles tendon, hamstring tendon, and tibialis tendon grafts following (1) no preconditioning, (2) preconditioning on a tension board (89 N of initial force held for twenty minutes), (3) preconditioning in situ (89 N of force applied to the tibial end of the graft during twenty-five flexion-extension cycles), and (4) a combination of protocols 2 and 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A comparison of 11 o'clock versus oblique femoral tunnels in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee: knee kinematics during a simulated pivot test.

Am J Sports Med

May 2010

Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA Rehabilitation Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1795, USA.

Background: Traditionally, a standard femoral tunnel for a single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is positioned 6 to 7 mm anterior to the posterior wall at an 11 o'clock orientation in the femoral notch (right knee). However, some surgeons have advocated placing the femoral tunnel at a more oblique orientation at or near the femoral footprint of the ACL's posterolateral bundle (at approximately 9:30 to 10 o'clock in the notch) to provide the graft with a better mechanical advantage for controlling tibial rotation and eliminating the pivot shift.

Hypothesis: Moving the femoral tunnel from the standard location to an oblique position in the femoral notch will significantly reduce the magnitude of a simulated pivot shift.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We examined the relationships of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), disease duration (DD), number of previous disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), and frequency of DMARD changes, with regard to changes in function in patients with RA evaluated by modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) after the start of a new DMARD.

Methods: In total, 889 patients with active RA from the CORRONA database [patients had mHAQ>or=0.5 and/or Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28)>or=1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: With grade 3 posterolateral injuries of the knee, reconstructions of the lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, and popliteofibular ligament are commonly performed in conjunction with a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to restore knee stability.

Hypothesis: A lateral collateral ligament reconstruction, alone or with a popliteus tendon or popliteofibular ligament reconstruction, will produce normal varus rotation patterns and restore posterior cruciate ligament graft forces to normal levels in response to an applied varus moment.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biomechanical effects of medial-lateral tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

J Orthop Res

January 2003

Biomechanics Research Section, UCLA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Room 21-67 UCLA Rehabilitation Center, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

With most posterior cruciate (PCL) reconstruction techniques, the distal end of the graft is fixed within a tibial bone tunnel. Although a surgical goal is to locate this tunnel at the center of the PCL's tibial footprint, errors in medial-lateral tunnel placement of the tibial drill guide are possible because the position of the tip of the guide relative to the PCL's tibial footprint can be difficult to visualize from the standard arthroscopy portals. This study was designed to measure changes in knee laxity and graft forces resulting from mal-position of the tibial tunnel medial and lateral to the center of the PCL's tibial insertion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF