5 results match your criteria: "Stanford University Department of Ophthalmology[Affiliation]"
J Cataract Refract Surg
May 2006
Stanford University Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of Visx CustomVue wavefront-guided enhancement after previous keratorefractive surgery.
Setting: Stanford University Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was used to evaluate wavefront-guided enhancement in a preliminary set of 120 eyes of 102 patients.
Am J Ophthalmol
December 2004
Stanford University Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford, California, USA.
Purpose: To identify the risk factors, prognostic factors, and clinical outcomes of patients with perioperative appositional suprachoroidal hemorrhage (ASCH).
Design: Case-control study.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Retina
February 2004
California Vitreo-retinal Center, Stanford University Department of Ophthalmology, 1225 Crane Street, Menlo Park, CA 04025, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol
November 2003
Stanford University Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford, California, USA.
Purpose: To report the clinical features, causative organisms, management, and visual acuity outcomes of eight eyes of eight patients who developed acute postoperative endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA).
Design: Retrospective, multicenter, interventional, case series.
Methods: A retrospective, interventional, case series of all patients with acute postoperative endophthalmitis following IVTA at seven academic clinical centers between March 2001 and July 2002.
Ophthalmology
August 1997
Stanford University Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford, California, USA.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine whether there is a nonanesthetic and nontoxic concentration of topical proparacaine that can be applied repeatedly to the cornea to reduce pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Methods: Part I: To determine a nonanesthetic concentration, the corneal sensitivity of 50 healthy volunteers was assessed using aesthesiometry before and after a drop of either 0.01%, 0.