Society of Surgical Oncology Consensus Statement: Assessing the Evidence for and Utility of Gene Expression Profiling of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Introduction: Gene expression profiling (GEP) of primary cutaneous melanoma aims to offer prognostic and predictive information to guide clinical care. Despite limited evidence of clinical utility, these tests are increasingly incorporated into clinical care.

Methods: A panel of melanoma experts from the Society of Surgical Oncology convened to develop recommendations regarding the use of GEP to guide management of patients with melanoma.

How Many Sentinel Lymph Nodes Should We Excise in Patients With Melanoma?

Introduction: The management of many patients with early-stage melanoma includes sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for prognostic and treatment planning purposes. While the minimum necessary number of SLNs to examine has been determined for patients with other malignancies, it has not been delineated in melanoma. The current study evaluates risk factors for SLN positivity and the associated number of SLNs that are necessary to examine for appropriate staging.

Melanoma: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Cutaneous malignant melanoma accounts for 5% of cancer diagnoses and is the fifth most common cancer diagnosed in the United States. Risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma include ultraviolet radiation from sun exposure, Fitzpatrick skin type I or II, a history of dysplastic nevi, indoor tanning, older age, and a personal or family history of melanoma. The U.

Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant?: A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival.

Background: Presence of positive biopsy margins in melanoma can provoke anxiety over potential disease progression from delays to surgical excision, but their impact on outcomes is unknown. We aimed to compare the presence of residual melanoma in the surgical excision specimen and survival between patients with negative, microscopically positive, and macroscopically positive biopsy margins.

Methods: Patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical excision over a 13-year period were included.

Incidental detection of non-melanoma neoplasms in sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma staging: A retrospective case series.

Background: Patients with malignant melanoma have an increased risk of developing secondary hematologic malignancy, and patients with hematologic malignancies have an increased risk of developing melanoma. Rarely, sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) collected for melanoma staging might harbor lymphoma or even carcinoma, which may represent a second primary malignancy (SPM). Biopsied lymph node(s) might serve as the first site of recognition for a SPM.

Multicenter analysis of the surgical management and adjuvant therapy of patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Introduction: Complete lymph node dissection (CLND) was the standard practice for patients with melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) until the results of 2 clinical trials published in 2016 and 2017 demonstrated that it did not improve melanoma-specific survival (MSS). However, it continues to be performed in some scenarios. No studies have ever been published on lymph node management after a positive SLNB in the routine clinical practice in our setting.

False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience.

Background: The status of the regional lymph node basin is of prognostic importance in patients with melanoma, making the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) a key component of patient care management, particularly with the advent of immunotherapy for adjuvant treatment. The primary goal of our study was to assess the false-negative rate of SLNBs among patients with melanoma.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB by a single surgeon between Jan.

Prediction of High Nodal Burden in Patients With Sentinel Node-Positive Luminal ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Importance: In patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer and 1 or 2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastases, omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) is standard. High nodal burden (≥4 axillary nodal metastases) is an indication for intensified treatment in luminal breast cancer; hence, abstaining from CALND may result in undertreatment.

Objective: To develop a prediction model for high nodal burden in luminal ERBB2-negative breast cancer (all histologic types and lobular breast cancer separately) without CALND.

Use of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test to Aid in the Decision of Adjuvant Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States, with over 7,000 deaths annually. Although most patients diagnosed with early-stage (stage I or II) disease have an excellent prognosis, two out of three patients who die from melanoma were initially diagnosed in early stages. Thus, additional methods to identify which patients are at risk of poor outcomes are needed.

Next day sentinel node biopsy for melanoma after lymphoscintigraphy using Tc-labelled nanocolloid does not adversely affect long-term outcomes.

Objective: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is an important management tool for early-stage melanoma. Different radiopharmaceuticals are used internationally to localise the sentinel node using lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) before surgery. Recent reports have suggested that a delayed interval between LSG and SLNB using Tc-labelled nanocolloid tracer has an adverse survival impact, but not with Tc-labelled antimony sulphide colloid.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Metastatic Disease following Surgery for Clinically Localized Cutaneous Melanoma.

Introduction: The NCCN considers "baseline staging" (whole body CT or PET scan +/- brain MRI) for all asymptomatic melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. The true yield of these workups is unknown.

Methods: We created cohorts of adult malignant melanoma patients, using the National Cancer Database (2012-2020) to mimic three common scenarios: (1) clinically node negative, with positive sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNB[+]); (2) clinically node negative, with negative sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNB[-]); (3) clinically node positive with confirmed lymph node metastases (cN[+] and pN[+]).

BAUSSS biomarker improves melanoma survival risk assessment.

Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) method of staging melanoma is dated and inaccurate. It ignores important prognostic melanoma features, especially the patient's age. BAUSSS is more accurate in determining survival risk for primary cutaneous melanoma patients who have no clinical or imaging evidence of nodal or distant metastases.

Integrating the melanoma 31-gene expression profile test with clinical and pathologic features can provide personalized precision estimates for sentinel lymph node positivity: an independent performance cohort.

Introduction: Up to 88% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) are negative. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test can help identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis who can safely forego SLNB. The 31-GEP classifies patients as low (Class 1 A), intermediate (Class 1B/2A), or high risk (Class 2B) for recurrence, metastasis, and SLN positivity.

The benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly patients with melanoma: A retrospective analysis of SEER Medicare data (2010-2018).

Background: Sentinel lymph node status is critical for melanoma staging and treatment. However, the factors influencing SLNB and its oncologic benefits in elderly patients are unclear.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥65 with clinically node-negative melanoma and Breslow depth ≥1 ​mm, using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database (2010-2018).

31-GEP (DecisionDx): a review of clinical utility and performance in a Mayo Clinic cohort.

Background: Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is a significant health concern because of its high metastatic potential. Gene Expression Profile (GEP) testing, particularly the 31-GEP test (DecisionDx-Melanoma), has been increasingly used for risk stratification in CM patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility and performance of the 31-GEP test in a real-world setting.

Using Nomograms Wisely: Predicting Sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma.

Background: Four externally validated sentinel node biopsy (SNB) prediction nomograms exist for malignant melanoma that each incorporate different clinical and histopathologic variables, which can result in substantially different risk estimations for the same patient. We demonstrate this variability by using hypothetical melanoma cases.

Methods: We compared the MSKCC and MIA calculators.

Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II Melanoma: Current Paradigms in Management and Future Directions.

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients.

Impact of the COVID pandemic on melanoma thickness and ulceration: a meta-analysis.

The global healthcare sector faced immense challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Oncologists noted reduced cancer screening, which impacted melanoma diagnosis and treatment, leading to concerns about delayed care and poorer outcomes. This review analyzes how the pandemic influenced melanoma ulceration risk and Breslow thickness index through a meta-analysis of published studies.