3 results match your criteria: "Sainte Marguerite University Hospital Marseille[Affiliation]"
Front Psychol
August 2014
CNRS, LPL, UMR 7309, Aix-Marseille Université Aix-en-Provence, France.
Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) often display social cognition disorders, including Theory of Mind (ToM) impairments and communication disruptions. Thought language disorders appear to be primarily a disruption of pragmatics, SZ can also experience difficulties at other linguistic levels including the prosodic one. Here, using an interactive paradigm, we showed that SZ individuals did not use prosodic phrasing to encode the contrastive status of discourse referents in French.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Hum Neurosci
June 2013
Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, CNRS UMR 7289 and Aix-Marseille Université Marseille, France ; Department of Psychiatry, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Sainte Marguerite University Hospital Marseille, France.
Psychopathy is a personality disorder frequently associated with immoral behaviors. Previous behavioral studies on the influence of psychopathy on moral decision have yielded contradictory results, possibly because they focused either on judgment (abstract evaluation) or on choice of hypothetical action, two processes that may rely on different mechanisms. In this study, we explored the influence of the level of psychopathic traits on judgment and choice of hypothetical action during moral dilemma evaluation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Psychol
May 2013
Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, CNRS UMR 7289, Aix-Marseille Université Marseille, France ; Assistance Publique - Department of Psychiatry, Hôpitaux de Marseille, Sainte Marguerite University Hospital Marseille, France.
Everyone has experienced the potential discrepancy between what one judges as morally acceptable and what one actually does when a choice between alternative behaviors is to be made. The present study explores empirically whether judgment and choice of action differ when people make decisions on dilemmas involving moral issues. Two hundred and forty participants evaluated 24 moral and non-moral dilemmas either by judging ("Is it acceptable to…") or reporting the choice of action they would make ("Would you do…").
View Article and Find Full Text PDF