20 results match your criteria: "Rush Craniofacial Center[Affiliation]"
J Craniofac Surg
February 2024
Rush Craniofacial Center, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center.
Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) results in facial asymmetry, malocclusion, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Treatment consists of both surgical and orthodontic intervention. A review was performed for 4 patients with UCH who underwent digital surgical planning (DSP)-assisted condylectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
May 2023
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Background: Patients with Down syndrome have severe facial deformities that can precipitate functional consequences and social stigmatization. Craniofacial surgical intervention can play a role in improving these symptoms and patient quality of life. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgical intervention in patients with Down syndrome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
June 2022
Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center.
A 32-year-old female with a repaired right unilateral cleft lip and palate underwent several surgical and orthodontic procedures during the rehabilitation process of her condition. Nine years after this extensive treatment she underwent transverse relapse of her maxilla and requested a consultation for its correction as she felt her speech and chewing were negatively affected. She presented with a transverse maxillary arch collapse on the cleft side with significant palatal scarring secondary to multiple palate procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
April 2022
Rush University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chicago.
Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is described as the incomplete closure of the velopharyngeal port during a speech production. Nasopharyngoscopy and/or multiplanar videofluoroscopy have been utilized for decades to assess the degree and nature of the dysfunction. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is presented as an additional diagnostic tool, allowing for clear visualization of the affected structures and the ability to obtain accurate measurements (within 100 microns) of the involved anatomy and defect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Plast Surg
July 2021
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 425 POB 1, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Distraction osteogenesis is a viable treatment option for patients with a cleft associated with severe maxillary retrusion. A rigid external distraction device and a hybrid internal maxillary distractor have been used to advance the maxilla allowing for predictable and stable results. These techniques can be applied by itself or as an adjunct to traditional orthognathic procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
September 2020
Rush Craniofacial Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery.
Custom alloplastic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction has been well established for the management of end-stage TMJ disease. However, its use in congenital TMJ deformities is limited. Here, the authors present initial outcomes of skeletally mature patients who underwent custom alloplastic TMJ reconstruction and simultaneous orthognathic surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
April 2020
Maxillofacial and Dental Health-Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Many orthodontists working on patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) have shown great enthusiasm for presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) to improve surgical outcomes with minimal intervention. Even though every clinician aims to use the best treatment modality for their patients, PSIO effects can be confounded by surgical type and timing of the primary repair, as is discussed in many studies. In such cases, one should be cautious when evaluating the particular outcomes for patients with CLP since it is difficult to differentiate the sole effect of an individual surgical or orthodontic intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
May 2015
Codirector, Craniofacial Center, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address:
Introduction: Hemifacial microsomia is a deformity of variable expressivity with unilateral hypoplasia of the mandible and the ear. In this study, we evaluated skeletal soft tissue changes after bimaxillary unilateral vertical distraction.
Methods: Eight patients (4 preadolescents 4 adolescents) each with a grade II mandibular deformity underwent a LeFort I osteotomy and an ipsilateral horizontal mandibular ramus osteotomy.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
December 2014
Department of Orthodontics, Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Background: Few publications have described the flap design of the secondary cleft alveoloplasty. In this article we describe a modified technique of the classical flap design with the purpose of minimizing injury to the dental papillae and periodontium of the involved dentition. We report our long-term experience, specifically with regards to oronasal fistulae recurrence, wound healing and graft exposure and loss.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
November 2012
Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Purpose: Nasal reconstruction for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) is a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) was introduced to reshape the cleft nasal structures prior to lip repair. This study analyzed two-dimensional nasal changes before and after PNAM in patients with complete UCLP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
September 2010
Chicago, Ill. From the Rush Craniofacial Center and the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center.
Background: Distraction osteogenesis is effective for correction of severe maxillary and midface hypoplasia. The vectors controlling the segment to be moved must be planned. This requires knowledge of the physical characteristics of the osteotomized bone segment, including the location of the center of mass (free body) and the center of resistance (restrained body).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
March 2010
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Objective: This retrospective study was conducted to analyze changes in the maxillary permanent molars after monobloc advancement with rigid external distraction (RED).
Setting: University hospital-based craniofacial center.
Materials And Methods: Fourteen patients, three in primary, eight in mixed, and three in permanent dentition underwent monobloc advancement with RED.
J Craniofac Surg
September 2009
Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Distraction osteogenesis has become a treatment alternative to treat severe craniofacial skeletal dysplasias. A rigid external distraction device has been successfully used to advance the maxilla as well as the maxillary, orbital, and forehead complex (monobloc) in children as young as 2 years, adolescents, and adults. For this severe group of patients, the technique has been found to be simpler and safer than traditional surgical methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Oral Maxillofac Surg
December 2008
Rush Craniofacial Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Orthod Craniofac Res
August 2007
Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) has become a treatment alternative to treat severe craniofacial skeletal dysplasias. A rigid external distraction (RED) device has been successfully used to advance the maxilla as well as the maxillary, orbital and forehead complex (monobloc) in children as young as two years, adolescents and adults. This approach has provided predictable and stable results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
September 2005
Rush Craniofacial Center, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Mandibular ramus height restoration by distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a key procedure in mandibular hypoplasia reconstruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate short-term skeletal changes in the regenerated bone after vertical mandibular ramus DO using a buried distraction device. Eight subadult beagle dogs underwent bilateral vertical mandibular ramus DO.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
November 2004
Rush Craniofacial Center, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg
November 2004
Rush Craniofacial Center and the Department of Plastic Surgery, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill 60612, USA.
Rigid external distraction is a highly effective technique for correction of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with orofacial clefts. The clinical results after correction of sagittal maxillary deformities in both the adult and pediatric age groups have been stable. The purpose of this retrospective longitudinal cephalometric study was to review the long-term stability of the repositioned maxilla in cleft patients who underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
July 2004
Augusta, Ga.; Dallas, Texas; Indianapolis, Ind.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Chicago, Ill.; From the Section of Plastic Surgery and Craniofacial Center, Medical College of Georgia; the Craniofacial Center, Medical City Dallas Hospital; Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Section of Plastic Surgery; Craniofacial Anomalies Program, C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan; and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Review the biomechanical principles and pertinent cellular and molecular biology of distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
September 2000
Rush Craniofacial Center, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
To review current information on craniofacial growth of unoperated patients with craniofacial malformations and stimulate the study of abnormal craniofacial growth through conventional and newer methods. This will lead to improved diagnosis and the understanding of the etiopathogenesis of craniofacial malformations. It is expected that this knowledge will also assist clinicians in planning treatment strategies to better manage these challenging conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF