264 results match your criteria: "Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy[Affiliation]"

While genetic testing may be the gateway to the future of medicine, it also poses challenges for individuals, especially in terms of differentiated treatments on the basis of their genetic characteristics. The fear of unwanted disclosure to insurers and the possibility of genetic discrimination can hamper the recruitment of individuals for clinical research that involves genetic testing. Precision medicine initiatives, such as All of Us, are proliferating in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Organ donor intervention trials and risk to bystanders: An ethical analysis.

Clin Trials

October 2019

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.

There are two distinct problems about bystander effects raised by organ donor intervention research. The first is the problem of "bystander organs"-sometimes called "non-target organs"-which Kimmelman discusses in his case presentation. How do we treat the recipients of organs that are not the subject of the intervention research but nonetheless might be directly affected by the research? The second problem is not about altering the organ but the pattern of distribution of organs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Heritable Genome Editing: Is a Moratorium Needed?

JAMA

July 2019

James A. Attwood and Leslie Williams professor of Law and director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Troubling Court Decision for Reproductive Rights: Legal Recognition of Fetal Standing to Sue.

JAMA

July 2019

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How bans on germline editing deprive patients with mitochondrial disease.

Nat Biotechnol

June 2019

Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Privacy in the age of medical big data.

Nat Med

January 2019

Project on Personalized Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, & Law, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Big data has become the ubiquitous watch word of medical innovation. The rapid development of machine-learning techniques and artificial intelligence in particular has promised to revolutionize medical practice from the allocation of resources to the diagnosis of complex diseases. But with big data comes big risks and challenges, among them significant questions about patient privacy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Big data and black-box medical algorithms.

Sci Transl Med

December 2018

University of Michigan Law School, 921 Legal Research, 801 Monroe St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

New machine-learning techniques entering medicine present challenges in validation, regulation, and integration into practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Ethics of Heritable Genome Editing: New Considerations in a Controversial Area.

JAMA

December 2018

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There has been increasing attention to financial conflicts of interest (COI) in public health research and policy making, with concerns that some decisions are not in the public interest. One notable problematic area is expert advisory committee (EAC). While COI management has focused on disclosure, it could go further and assess experts' degree of (in)dependence with commercial interests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A key aim of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) is to generate data that are important to patients by deliberately and extensively involving them in all aspects of research, from design to dissemination. However, certain elements of PCOR raise challenging and potentially novel ethical and regulatory issues for institutional review boards and oversight bodies. These challenges stem primarily from the engagement of patients in roles other than research subject, such as advisors, study personnel, and co-investigators, which gives rise to questions about appropriate levels of protection, training, and education, as well as identifying and managing conflicts of interest.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Personhood and the Three Branches of Government.

N Engl J Med

June 2018

From Harvard Law School and the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University - both in Cambridge, MA (I.G.C.), and Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (E.Y.A.).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The practice of paying research participants has received significant attention in the bioethics literature, but the focus has been almost exclusively on consideration of factors relevant to determining acceptable payment amounts. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to what happens once the payment amount is set. What are the ethical parameters around how offers of payment may be advertised to prospective participants? This article seeks to answer this question, focusing on the ethical and practical issues associated with disclosing information about payment, and payment amounts in particular, in recruitment materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preventing Mitochondrial Diseases: Embryo-Sparing Donor-Independent Options.

Trends Mol Med

May 2018

Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Mutant mitochondrial DNA gives rise to a broad range of incurable inborn maladies. Prevention may now be possible by replacing the mutation-carrying mitochondria of zygotes or oocytes at risk with donated unaffected counterparts. However, mitochondrial replacement therapy is being held back by theological, ethical, and safety concerns over the loss of human zygotes and the involvement of a donor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Framework for Ethical Payment to Research Participants.

N Engl J Med

February 2018

From the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge (L.G., I.G.C., H.F.L.), and Harvard Catalyst-Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School (L.G., I.G.C., B.E.B., H.F.L.), Boston Children's Hospital (S.K.), the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University (B.E.B.), and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (B.E.B.), Boston - all in Massachusetts; and the Perelman School of Medicine and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (E.A.L., H.F.L.).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deciphering the Sunshine Act: Transparency Regulation and Financial Conflicts in Health Care.

Am J Law Med

November 2017

Arch T. Allen Distinguished Professor, UNC School of Law; Professor (Secondary Appointment), UNC School of Medicine; Adjunct Professor, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health. This article benefited from helpful comments received by participants at the UNC School of Law Faculty Workshop and a conference at Harvard Law School's Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics. Special thanks also to MacKenzie Dickerman and Kerry Dutra for excellent research assistance.

The Physician Payments Sunshine Act ("Sunshine Act"), enacted to address financial conflicts in health care, is the first comprehensive federal legislation mandating public reporting of payments between drug companies, device manufacturers, and medicine. This article analyzes the Sunshine Act's uneven record, exploring how the law serves as an intriguing example of the uncertain case for transparency regulation in health care. The Sunshine Act's bumpy rollout demonstrates that commanding transparency through legislation can be arduous because of considerable implementation challenges.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preventing Mitochondrial Disease: A Path Forward.

Obstet Gynecol

March 2018

The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and Harvard Law School, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

In a possible first, the heritable transmission of a fatal mitochondrial DNA disease (Leigh syndrome) may have been prevented by replacing the mutation-bearing mitochondria of oocytes with donated mutation-free counterparts. The procedure, carried out by a U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Paying Research Participants: Regulatory Uncertainty, Conceptual Confusion, and a Path Forward.

Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics

June 2018

Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School.

Article Synopsis
  • Paying people to take part in clinical research is common, but it raises questions about whether it pressures them too much to join.
  • There are not clear rules about what kind of payments are okay, leading to confusion for researchers and review boards.
  • The article suggests that concerns about payments are often seen as special to research, but treating them just like payments in other fields can help clarify rules about coercion and undue influence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Paying Research Participants: The Outsized Influence of "Undue Influence".

IRB

July 2018

Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School; Faculty, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School; Regulatory Foundations, Ethics, and Law Program, Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF