264 results match your criteria: "Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy[Affiliation]"
Nat Med
August 2019
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
While genetic testing may be the gateway to the future of medicine, it also poses challenges for individuals, especially in terms of differentiated treatments on the basis of their genetic characteristics. The fear of unwanted disclosure to insurers and the possibility of genetic discrimination can hamper the recruitment of individuals for clinical research that involves genetic testing. Precision medicine initiatives, such as All of Us, are proliferating in the United States.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Trials
October 2019
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
There are two distinct problems about bystander effects raised by organ donor intervention research. The first is the problem of "bystander organs"-sometimes called "non-target organs"-which Kimmelman discusses in his case presentation. How do we treat the recipients of organs that are not the subject of the intervention research but nonetheless might be directly affected by the research? The second problem is not about altering the organ but the pattern of distribution of organs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA
July 2019
James A. Attwood and Leslie Williams professor of Law and director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
JAMA
July 2019
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nat Biotechnol
June 2019
Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Science
May 2019
Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lancet
May 2019
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA; Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet
March 2019
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
IRB
January 2018
Harvard Law School, Faculty Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School.
Nat Med
January 2019
Project on Personalized Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, & Law, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Big data has become the ubiquitous watch word of medical innovation. The rapid development of machine-learning techniques and artificial intelligence in particular has promised to revolutionize medical practice from the allocation of resources to the diagnosis of complex diseases. But with big data comes big risks and challenges, among them significant questions about patient privacy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Transl Med
December 2018
University of Michigan Law School, 921 Legal Research, 801 Monroe St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
New machine-learning techniques entering medicine present challenges in validation, regulation, and integration into practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA
December 2018
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ann Intern Med
December 2018
Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (E.Y.A.).
PLoS One
March 2019
Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Importance: Approximately one-third of U.S. life sciences faculty engage in industry consulting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVaccine
November 2018
School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101, Ave du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada. Electronic address:
There has been increasing attention to financial conflicts of interest (COI) in public health research and policy making, with concerns that some decisions are not in the public interest. One notable problematic area is expert advisory committee (EAC). While COI management has focused on disclosure, it could go further and assess experts' degree of (in)dependence with commercial interests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Intern Med
October 2018
Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (I.G.C.).
A key aim of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) is to generate data that are important to patients by deliberately and extensively involving them in all aspects of research, from design to dissemination. However, certain elements of PCOR raise challenging and potentially novel ethical and regulatory issues for institutional review boards and oversight bodies. These challenges stem primarily from the engagement of patients in roles other than research subject, such as advisors, study personnel, and co-investigators, which gives rise to questions about appropriate levels of protection, training, and education, as well as identifying and managing conflicts of interest.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Engl J Med
June 2018
From Harvard Law School and the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University - both in Cambridge, MA (I.G.C.), and Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI (E.Y.A.).
Ther Innov Regul Sci
May 2018
4 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
The practice of paying research participants has received significant attention in the bioethics literature, but the focus has been almost exclusively on consideration of factors relevant to determining acceptable payment amounts. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to what happens once the payment amount is set. What are the ethical parameters around how offers of payment may be advertised to prospective participants? This article seeks to answer this question, focusing on the ethical and practical issues associated with disclosing information about payment, and payment amounts in particular, in recruitment materials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends Mol Med
May 2018
Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Mutant mitochondrial DNA gives rise to a broad range of incurable inborn maladies. Prevention may now be possible by replacing the mutation-carrying mitochondria of zygotes or oocytes at risk with donated unaffected counterparts. However, mitochondrial replacement therapy is being held back by theological, ethical, and safety concerns over the loss of human zygotes and the involvement of a donor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Engl J Med
February 2018
From the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge (L.G., I.G.C., H.F.L.), and Harvard Catalyst-Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School (L.G., I.G.C., B.E.B., H.F.L.), Boston Children's Hospital (S.K.), the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University (B.E.B.), and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (B.E.B.), Boston - all in Massachusetts; and the Perelman School of Medicine and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (E.A.L., H.F.L.).
Am J Law Med
November 2017
Arch T. Allen Distinguished Professor, UNC School of Law; Professor (Secondary Appointment), UNC School of Medicine; Adjunct Professor, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health. This article benefited from helpful comments received by participants at the UNC School of Law Faculty Workshop and a conference at Harvard Law School's Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics. Special thanks also to MacKenzie Dickerman and Kerry Dutra for excellent research assistance.
The Physician Payments Sunshine Act ("Sunshine Act"), enacted to address financial conflicts in health care, is the first comprehensive federal legislation mandating public reporting of payments between drug companies, device manufacturers, and medicine. This article analyzes the Sunshine Act's uneven record, exploring how the law serves as an intriguing example of the uncertain case for transparency regulation in health care. The Sunshine Act's bumpy rollout demonstrates that commanding transparency through legislation can be arduous because of considerable implementation challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObstet Gynecol
March 2018
The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and Harvard Law School, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
In a possible first, the heritable transmission of a fatal mitochondrial DNA disease (Leigh syndrome) may have been prevented by replacing the mutation-bearing mitochondria of oocytes with donated mutation-free counterparts. The procedure, carried out by a U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFYale J Health Policy Law Ethics
June 2018
Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School.
IRB
July 2018
Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School; Faculty, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School; Regulatory Foundations, Ethics, and Law Program, Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center.