13 results match your criteria: "Pegasus Health Justice Center[Affiliation]"
Am J Obstet Gynecol
January 2025
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Background: With increasingly restricted access to facility-based abortion in the United States, pregnant people are increasingly relying on models of care that utilize history-based or no-test approaches to eligibility assessment. Minimal research has examined the accuracy of abortion patients' self-assessment of eligibility for medication abortion using their health history, a necessary step towards ensuring optimal access to history-based or no-test models, as well as potential over-the-counter access.
Objective: To examine the accuracy of pregnant people's eligibility for medication abortion determined using their self-reported health history as compared to clinician assessment with ultrasound and other tests.
Contraception
December 2024
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Raleigh, NC, USA and McLeod Regional Medical Center, Florence, SC, USA; University of Washington Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356460, Seattle, WA 98005, USA; Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, TX, 75207, USA; Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Early pregnancy loss (EPL), also known as miscarriage or spontaneous abortion, makes up 15-20% of all clinically recognized pregnancies. EPL is a broad term that includes intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs) with findings that suggest the pregnancy may not progress or definitely will not progress; pregnancies with a gestational sac (GS) in the lower endometrial cavity or endocervical canal in the process of expulsion; residual pregnancy tissue or persistent GS; and complete passage of the GS without residual tissue. This document addresses medication management of EPL in which the complete passage of the GS has not yet occurred, including pregnancies concerning for and diagnostic of EPL (sometimes called "missed abortion") and EPL in progress.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReprod Health
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francsico, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Background: Since the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in June 2022, providers throughout the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol
January 2025
Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, TX.
Given the limitations in perioperative management strategies available at freestanding abortion clinics, abortion providers must commonly discern which patients are too complicated for procedural abortions at their center and must be referred for a hospital-based abortion. The need to transition from freestanding clinics to hospital-based abortion care can lead to delays in completing an abortion and significant social, economic, and psychological repercussions for the pregnant individual. One significant clinical problem that exemplifies the issue of who can be safely taken care of at a freestanding abortion clinic is when the placenta accreta spectrum is suspected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Pediatr
August 2024
Department of Child Health, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health
September 2024
Pegasus Health Justice Center, Texas Equal Access Fund, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Context: Abortion assistance funds constitute an important part of the healthcare safety net by covering some of abortion patients' out-of-pocket costs. Few studies have examined the other ways abortion assistance fund staff and volunteers support callers who need help obtaining care.
Methods: Between June and September 2020, we conducted in-depth interviews with 23 staff and volunteers at 11 local abortion assistance funds that helped Texans seeking abortion care following a March 2020 state executive order that prohibited most abortions.
Obstet Gynecol
May 2023
Texas Policy Evaluation Project and the Population Research Center, the Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, the Steve Hicks School of Social Work, and the Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, the Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas.
Objective: To evaluate how Texas health care professionals who care for patients experiencing medically complex pregnancies navigate abortion restrictions.
Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with health care professionals across Texas who cared for patients with life-limiting fetal diagnoses or who had existing or developed health conditions that adversely affected pregnancy. We conducted the first round of interviews March-June 2021 and the second round of interviews January-May 2022 after the implementation of Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which prohibited most abortions after detection of embryonic cardiac activity.
Obstet Gynecol
March 2023
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; and the Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, Texas.
Objective: To describe experiences with abortion counseling and access in patients with lethal or life-limiting fetal diagnoses in Texas after enactment of Senate Bill 8 (SB8).
Methods: In this qualitative study, we interviewed patients who obtained abortions after enactment of SB8, using semi-structured interviews to explore how restrictions affected abortion care. Two researchers coded all transcripts using an inductive technique and analyzed themes in an iterative approach.
N Engl J Med
August 2022
From the Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Population Research Center (W.A., K.L., A.B., K.W.), the Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School (L.H.), the Steve Hicks School of Social Work (K.W.), and the Department of Sociology (K.W.), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (A.B.), and the Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas (G.M.).
Obstet Gynecol
June 2022
Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California; Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Black Women for Wellness, Los Angeles, California; the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, Chicago, Illinois; Advocates for Youth, Washington, DC; the National Network of Abortion Funds, Boston, Massachusetts; International Planned Parenthood, London, United Kingdom; the Red River Women's Clinic, Fargo, North Dakota; the Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, Texas; Physicians for Reproductive Health, New York, New York; Gynuity Health Projects, Tacoma, Washington; California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Los Angeles, California; and the Steve Hicks School of Social Work and Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Objective: To develop a drug facts label prototype for a combination mifepristone and misoprostol product and to conduct a label-comprehension study to assess understanding of key label concepts.
Methods: We followed U.S.
Contraception
September 2022
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a burden to healthcare systems around the world and has changed the way people access health services, including contraception. This document sets forth guidance from the Society of Family Planning for providing contraceptive care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, including when access to healthcare is restricted due to pandemic response. It also outlines the role of telehealth for providing contraceptive care beyond the pandemic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol
May 2022
Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health research group, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA.
Background: Mifepristone, used together with misoprostol, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medication abortion through 10 weeks' gestation. Although in-person ultrasound is frequently used to establish medication abortion eligibility, previous research demonstrates that people seeking abortion early in pregnancy can accurately self-assess gestational duration using the date of their last menstrual period.
Objective: In this study, we establish the screening performance of a broader set of questions for self-assessment of gestational duration among a sample of people seeking abortion at a wide range of gestations.
J Adolesc Health
February 2022
College of Medicine- Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; Camelback Family Planning, Phoenix, Arizona.