49 results match your criteria: "New York University School of Medicine. Electronic address: sripalbangalore@gmail.com.[Affiliation]"

Background: Cancer patients are at risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-based therapies (CBT) are novel reperfusion options for PE though data in patients with cancer is lacking.

Study Design And Methods: Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE were identified using the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2017 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study, we found that a low LVOT VTI (<15 cm), a simple bedside point-of-care measurement, predicts normotensive shock in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The primary objective of our study was to determine the proportion of intermediate-risk PE patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) who achieved therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) at the time of the procedure. The salient findings of our study showed that only a minority of patients (14.3%) were in the therapeutic range by ACT at the time of MT (primary outcome).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intravascular imaging-guided PCI, functionally guided PCI, and conventional angiography-guided PCI in optimizing patient outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • A total of 32 randomized controlled trials involving 22,684 patients were analyzed, showing that intravascular imaging-guided PCI significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, compared to angiography-guided PCI.
  • Intravascular imaging-guided PCI consistently ranked as the best strategy for reducing cardiovascular risks in both patients with and without acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The optimal treatment strategy of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) (especially those with intermediate risk) continues to evolve and remains controversial.

Objectives: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation (AC) alone, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and systemic thrombolysis (ST) in patients with acute PE.

Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials or observational studies which compared outcomes of AC alone, CDT, and ST in acute PE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and hypotension (high-risk PE) have high mortality. Cardiogenic shock can also occur in nonhypotensive or normotensive patients (intermediate-risk PE) but is less well characterized.

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of normotensive shock in intermediate-risk PE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We aimed to investigate long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) using a meta-analysis from updated published randomized trials. Our data showed that the risk of all-cause death as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between PCI and CABG, whereas PCI had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization compared to CABG. Decisions for PCI versus CABG for LMCAD should be based on weighing the upfront morbidity and mortality risk of CABG with late risk of repeat revascularization with PCI and taking into consideration patient preference.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction: Is There an Expiry Date?

Can J Cardiol

October 2020

Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. It is still uncontrolled in most countries and no therapies are currently available. Various drugs are under investigation for its treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes with completeness of revascularization (CR) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD) who underwent PCI using everolimus-eluting stent (EES). Patients with MVD who underwent PCI using EES in New York State were chosen. Patients were categorized into CR, attempted but failed CR or incomplete revascularization (ICR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with diabetes and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. Everolimus eluting stents (EES) have been shown to be superior to paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) in patients with diabetes. However, it is not known if EES is as beneficial in diabetic patients with CKD compared with those without CKD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The association between admission blood pressure (BP) and outcomes in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) is not well defined. Patients in the United States national Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry with a TIA were included. Admission systolic and diastolic BP was used to compute mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure (PP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stable ischemic heart disease are at markedly increased risk of cardiovascular events. Prior trials comparing a strategy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without revascularization have largely excluded patients with advanced CKD. Whether a routine invasive approach when compared with a conservative strategy is beneficial in such patients is unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) have compared a strategy of routine multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed either as a single procedure or as staged procedures to culprit-only PCI. All of these trials have been underpowered for clinical end points. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCT comparing multivessel PCI with culprit-only PCI in patients with STEMI and MVD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Do We Need a Trial of DES Versus CABG Surgery in Diabetic Patients With ACS?

J Am Coll Cardiol

December 2017

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Significant progress has been made in the percutaneous coronary intervention technique from the days of balloon angioplasty to modern-day metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). Although metallic stents solve a temporary problem of acute recoil following balloon angioplasty, they leave behind a permanent problem implicated in very late events (in addition to neoatherosclerosis). BRS were developed as a potential solution to this permanent problem, but the promise of these devices has been tempered by clinical trials showing increased risk of safety outcomes, both early and late.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) recommend DAPT for 1 year in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, with a Class IIb recommendation for continuation. We aim to assess the evidence for these recommendations using a meta-analytic approach.

Methods: We searched electronic databases for randomized trials comparing short-term (≤6 months) vs 12-month vs extended (>12 months) DAPT in patients with an acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target After SPRINT: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Am J Med

June 2017

Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Background: The optimal on-treatment blood pressure (BP) target has been a matter of debate. The recent SPRINT trial showed significant benefits of a BP target of <120 mm Hg, albeit with an increase in serious adverse effects related to low BP.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized trials comparing treating with different BP targets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF