7 results match your criteria: "National Center of Environmental Assessment[Affiliation]"
Arch Toxicol
January 2020
National Center of Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
Advances in the biological sciences have led to an ongoing paradigm shift in toxicity testing based on expanded application of high-throughput in vitro screening and in silico methods to assess potential health risks of environmental agents. This review examines progress on the vision for toxicity testing elaborated by the US National Research Council (NRC) during the decade that has passed since the 2007 NRC report on Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C). Concomitant advances in exposure assessment, including computational approaches and high-throughput exposomics, are also documented.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRegul Toxicol Pharmacol
August 2018
Texas A&M, School of Public Health, College Station, TX, USA.
Thiodiglycolic acid (TDGA) is a major metabolite of vinyl chloride monomer (VCM), and it has been suggested as an exposure biomarker for VCM. The validity of this biomarker when the level of VCM is less than 5 ppm, however, is questionable. The objective of this article is to evaluate the feasibility of using urinary TDGA as a biomarker of VCM exposure in a community health risk assessment setting where the concentration of VCM in air is typically very low (likely below 1 ppm).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnviron Health Perspect
January 2011
National Center of Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Background: Quantifying the benefits of reducing hazardous air pollutants (HAPs, or air toxics) has been limited by gaps in toxicological data, uncertainties in extrapolating results from high-dose animal experiments to estimate human effects at lower doses, limited ambient and personal exposure monitoring data, and insufficient economic research to support valuation of the health impacts often associated with exposure to individual air toxics.
Objectives: To address some of these issues, the U.S.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
December 2007
National Center of Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA Office of Research and Development, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (8623D), Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Regulatory agencies and the scientific community have been engaged in a long-term effort to strengthen health risk assessment procedures. Recently the momentum of this effort has accelerated to increasing biological information for a variety of toxic compounds and emphasis on the policy goal of broader characterization of scientific uncertainty (in contrast to providing only a single risk estimate). For example, the OMB Regulatory Analysis Guidelines [OMB, 2003.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRegul Toxicol Pharmacol
October 2003
National Center of Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Environmental regulations aimed at reducing cancer risks usually have the effect of reducing exposure to a carcinogen at the time the regulation is implemented. The reduction of cancer risk may occur shortly after the reduced exposure or after a considerable period of time. The time of risk reduction associated with exposure reduction will vary by compound.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Toxicol Environ Health A
November 2000
National Center of Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Toxicol Lett
September 1995
US Environmental Protection Agency, National Center of Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
This review paper gives an overview of the building blocks of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models and their implementation using computer facilities. The approach focuses on the development of a PBPK model with the most important and appropriate limiting steps for the conditions and exposure scenarios under study. In this approach, the assumptions made in constructing the set of equations, as well as the fitting of variables to specific experimental results, need to be accounted for when making extrapolation to other conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF