355 results match your criteria: "National Cancer Institute "G. Pascale" Foundation[Affiliation]"
J Cancer Policy
December 2024
Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Gynecological Endocrinology and Menopause, Foundation IRCCS Polyclinic San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Background: Compared to male patients, sexual health remains poorly studied in women and sexual gender minority (SGM) patients with cancers.
Material And Methods: An online survey was developed by a multidisciplinary team to assess the awareness and attitude of Italian oncological providers facing sexual health during or after cancer treatment. On behalf of the respective scientific committees, the questionnaire was sent to Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies group (MITO) and to Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) Group.
Lung Cancer
December 2024
Coordinating Center, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland.
Advances in cancer treatments have significantly improved their effectiveness, yet access to first-line therapies remains limited. A 2017 survey revealed that over 25 % of metastatic melanoma patients in Europe lacked access to recommended therapies. To address this, the European Association of Dermato-Oncology and the European Melanoma Registry conducted a follow-up study on the registration and reimbursement of first-line treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Genitourin Cancer
November 2024
Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.
Ann Oncol
January 2025
Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Instituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
J Transl Med
October 2024
Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
December 2024
Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Objective: There are no data, and thus no consensus, on the optimal duration of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy for exceptional responders (here defined as progression-free for 5 years or longer) with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The current licence is to continue PARP inhibitors until progression or toxicity; however, international practice varies considerably. The risks of late progression and late-onset myeloid malignancies, defined as occurring beyond 5 years of PARP inhibition, are unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Cancer
March 2025
Uro-Gynecological Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy.
NEJM Evid
October 2024
Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Background: The impact of the order of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors on the development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic unresectable V600-mutant melanoma is unknown. The SECOMBIT trial examined the impact of the order of receipt of these treatments in such patients.
Methods: In this three-arm trial, we reviewed patients without brain metastases who received the BRAF/MEK inhibitors encorafenib and binimetinib until they had progressive disease followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab (arm A); or treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by encorafenib and binimetinib (arm B); or treatment with encorafenib and binimetinib for 8 weeks followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by retreatment with encorafenib arm binimetinib (arm C).
Dermatol Reports
May 2024
Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, G. Pascale Foundation National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Eur J Cancer
November 2024
Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris & University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Ann Surg
September 2024
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Depending on stage, histology, and patient factors, the standard management of cervical cancer is a combination of treatment approaches, including (fertility- or non-fertility-sparing) surgery, radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and novel systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. While ambitious global initiatives seek to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the management of cervical cancer continues to evolve with major advances in imaging modalities, surgical approaches, identification of histopathological risk factors, radiotherapy techniques, and biomarker-driven personalized therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg
June 2024
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Minerva Urol Nephrol
June 2024
Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA -
Background: The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors.
Methods: The ROBUUST 2.
Lancet
June 2024
Endocrinology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino and DiMI, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Lancet
June 2024
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
August 2024
Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation, Herriman, UT, USA.
Background: In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis.
Methods: TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries.
Cancers (Basel)
May 2024
Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Results from the phase III clinical trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC who have PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, , and wild-type tumors. However, given the differences between patients treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in a clinical trial, real-world data are needed to confirm the treatment benefit in standard practice. Given the lack of data on large cohorts of patients with long follow-ups, we designed an observational retrospective study of patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab, starting from its reimbursement eligibility until December 2020.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Oncol
June 2024
Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est, School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
June 2024
Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) have been reported in approximately 1% of patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Outcome data are limited due to the rarity of this metastatic site. Therefore, the aim of our study is to describe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with PM treated as per clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Financial toxicity, defined as both the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress from a cancer diagnosis and its treatment, is a topic of interest in the assessment of the quality of life of patients with cancer and their families. Current evidence implicates financial toxicity in psychosocial, economic and other harms, leading to suboptimal cancer outcomes along the entire trajectory of diagnosis, treatment, supportive care, survivorship and palliation. This paper presents the results of a virtual consensus, based on the evidence base to date, on the screening and management of financial toxicity in patients with and beyond cancer organized by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Surg Oncol
June 2024
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore. Electronic address:
Ital J Dermatol Venerol
June 2024
Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, National Cancer Institute IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy -