108 results match your criteria: "Moore Center for Science[Affiliation]"
Ambio
December 2024
Snowchange Cooperative, 81235, Lehtoi, Finland.
Despite a well-established system of community lands, the current lack of spatial data on community territories impacts how Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs) in Europe are included in global discussions about land rights recognition and their critical role in land stewardship. We present an aggregation of spatial data for 42.5 Mha of recognized IPs and LCs lands in Western and Northern Europe, including data that were not previously included in global datasets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNature
January 2025
Institute for Capacity Exchange in Environmental Decisions, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Nature
December 2024
Institute for Capacity Exchange in Environmental Decisions, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Proc Biol Sci
October 2024
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Environ Evid
October 2023
The Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.
Background: Nature-based interventions (NbIs) for climate change mitigation include a diverse set of interventions aimed at conserving, restoring, and/or managing natural and modified ecosystems to improve their ability to store and sequester carbon and avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Recent projections estimate that terrestrial NbIs can lead to more than one-third of the climate change mitigation necessary to meet the Paris Climate Agreement by 2030. Further, these interventions can provide co-benefits in the form of social and ecological outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Commun
September 2024
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Nat Ecol Evol
October 2024
Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Glob Chang Biol
April 2024
Healthy Reefs Initiative, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Countries are expanding marine protected area (MPA) networks to mitigate fisheries declines and support marine biodiversity. However, MPA impact evaluations typically assess total fish biomass. Here, we examine how fish biomass disaggregated by adult and juvenile life stages responds to environmental drivers, including sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies and human footprint, and multiple management types at 139 reef sites in the Mesoamerican Reef (MAR) region.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
March 2024
Duke Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC 28516.
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
February 2024
Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA 22202.
Human-wildlife conflict is an important factor in the modern biodiversity crisis and has negative effects on both humans and wildlife (such as property destruction, injury, or death) that can impede conservation efforts for threatened species. Effectively addressing conflict requires an understanding of where it is likely to occur, particularly as climate change shifts wildlife ranges and human activities globally. Here, we examine how projected shifts in cropland density, human population density, and climatic suitability-three key drivers of human-elephant conflict-will shift conflict pressures for endangered Asian and African elephants to inform conflict management in a changing climate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Planet Health
January 2024
Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
December 2023
Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Addressing the ongoing biodiversity crisis requires identifying the winners and losers of global change. Species are often categorized based on how they respond to habitat loss; for example, species restricted to natural environments, those that most often occur in anthropogenic habitats, and generalists that do well in both. However, species might switch habitat affiliations across time and space: an organism may venture into human-modified areas in benign regions but retreat into thermally buffered forested habitats in areas with high temperatures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFConserv Biol
June 2024
Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Conserv Biol
April 2024
Ocean Conservation, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
Monitoring the governance and management effectiveness of area-based conservation has long been recognized as an important foundation for achieving national and global biodiversity goals and enabling adaptive management. However, there are still many barriers that prevent conservation actors, including those affected by governance and management systems from implementing conservation activities and programs and from gathering and using data on governance and management to inform decision-making across spatial scales and through time. We explored current and past efforts to assess governance and management effectiveness and barriers actors face in using the resulting data and insights to inform conservation decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNature
October 2023
Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Protected areas (PAs) are the primary strategy for slowing terrestrial biodiversity loss. Although expansion of PA coverage is prioritized under the Convention on Biological Diversity, it remains unknown whether PAs mitigate declines across the tetrapod tree of life and to what extent land cover and climate change modify PA effectiveness. Here we analysed rates of change in abundance of 2,239 terrestrial vertebrate populations across the globe.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr For Rep
April 2023
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA.
Purpose Of The Review: Improved forest management is a promising avenue for climate change mitigation. However, we lack synthetic understanding of how different management actions impact aboveground carbon stocks, particularly at scales relevant for designing and implementing forest-based climate solutions. Here, we quantitatively assess and review the impacts of three common practices-application of inorganic NPK fertilizer, interplanting with N-fixing species, and thinning-on aboveground carbon stocks in plantation forests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Ecol Evol
July 2023
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Protected areas (PAs) play a vital role in wildlife conservation. Nonetheless there is concern and uncertainty regarding how and at what spatial scales anthropogenic stressors influence the occurrence dynamics of wildlife populations inside PAs. Here we assessed how anthropogenic stressors influence occurrence dynamics of 159 mammal species in 16 tropical PAs from three biogeographic regions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Commun
June 2023
Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.
Forests play a critical role in stabilizing Earth's climate. Establishing protected areas (PAs) represents one approach to forest conservation, but PAs were rarely created to mitigate climate change. The global impact of PAs on the carbon cycle has not previously been quantified due to a lack of accurate global-scale carbon stock maps.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhilos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
July 2023
Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Growing threats to biodiversity demand timely, detailed information on species occurrence, diversity and abundance at large scales. Camera traps (CTs), combined with computer vision models, provide an efficient method to survey species of certain taxa with high spatio-temporal resolution. We test the potential of CTs to close biodiversity knowledge gaps by comparing CT records of terrestrial mammals and birds from the recently released Wildlife Insights platform to publicly available occurrences from many observation types in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends Ecol Evol
September 2023
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Environment, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; School of Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Ecol Appl
June 2023
School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Climate change is already having profound effects on biodiversity, but climate change adaptation has yet to be fully incorporated into area-based management tools used to conserve biodiversity, such as protected areas. One main obstacle is the lack of consensus regarding how impacts of climate change can be included in spatial conservation plans. We propose a climate-smart framework that prioritizes the protection of climate refugia-areas of low climate exposure and high biodiversity retention-using climate metrics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Commun
November 2022
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway.
An animal's daily use of time (their "diel activity") reflects their adaptations, requirements, and interactions, yet we know little about the underlying processes governing diel activity within and among communities. Here we examine whether community-level activity patterns differ among biogeographic regions, and explore the roles of top-down versus bottom-up processes and thermoregulatory constraints. Using data from systematic camera-trap networks in 16 protected forests across the tropics, we examine the relationships of mammals' diel activity to body mass and trophic guild.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
November 2022
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Massive biological databases of species occurrences, or georeferenced locations where a species has been observed, are essential inputs for modeling present and future species distributions. Location accuracy is often assessed by determining whether the observation geocoordinates fall within the boundaries of the declared political divisions. This otherwise simple validation is complicated by the difficulty of matching political division names to the correct geospatial object.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Total Environ
January 2023
USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
As climate change alters the global environment, it is critical to understand the relationship between shifting climate suitability and species distributions. Key questions include whether observed changes in population abundance are aligned with the velocity and direction of shifts predicted by climate suitability models and if the responses are consistent among species with similar ecological traits. We examined the direction and velocity of the observed abundance-based distribution centroids compared with the model-predicted bioclimatic distribution centroids of 250 bird species across the United States from 1969 to 2011.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlob Chang Biol
December 2022
Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
The spatial aggregation of species pairs often increases with the ecological similarity of the species involved. However, the way in which environmental conditions and anthropogenic activity affect the relationship between spatial aggregation and ecological similarity remains unknown despite the potential for spatial associations to affect species interactions, ecosystem function, and extinction risk. Given that human disturbance has been shown to both increase and decrease spatial associations among species pairs, ecological similarity may have a role in mediating these patterns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF