217 results match your criteria: "Metroplex Clinical Research[Affiliation]"

Objectives: This analysis reported the incidence of safety endpoints across five phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD), and chronic plaque psoriasis (PsO) who received ≥ 1 dose of adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product (RP).

Methods: Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for safety endpoints were calculated per 100 patient-years and reported by disease indication and treatment arm. Subgroup analyses by patient age and sex were also conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 5 years among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial.

Methods: Patients refractory to ≥1 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily or placebo, in combination with background conventional synthetic DMARD(s). At week 12, patients randomised to placebo were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the long-term sustainability of response to the Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) in the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial.

Methods: Patients on background conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were treated once daily with upadacitinib 15 mg or placebo. Patients who completed the week 24 visit could enter a long-term extension of up to 5 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To report long-term safety and tolerability of olokizumab (OKZ) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using pooled data from three randomised clinical trials (RCT) followed by open-label extension (OLE) study.

Methods: Cumulative data from three phase 3 core trials and their OLE were analysed. Safety variables assessed included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest and laboratory results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF‑06835375, a potent selective afucosyl immunoglobulin G1 antibody targeting C-X-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CXCR5) that potentially depletes B cells, follicular T helper (Tfh) cells, and circulating Tfh-like (cTfh) cells, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: This first-in-human, multicenter, double-blind, sponsor-open, placebo-controlled Phase 1 study recruited patients aged 18-70 years with SLE or RA. In Part A, patients received single doses of intravenous PF-06835375 (dose range: 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib compared to adalimumab in treating rheumatoid arthritis over a 5-year period, specifically for patients who didn’t respond well to methotrexate.
  • Both medications had similar rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, but upadacitinib had slightly higher occurrences of certain side effects, while it also delivered better clinical response rates and lower radiographic progression at the end of the study.
  • Overall, upadacitinib showed a favorable benefit-risk profile for long-term use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, confirming its safety and effectiveness over an extended period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examined the long-term effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib and adalimumab in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who were not meeting treatment goals after 228 weeks.
  • Patients switched from their initial treatment to the alternate therapy if they had a poor response, and various efficacy measures were tracked over the study period.
  • The results showed significant improvements in disease activity for both treatments, with minor advantages for upadacitinib, while safety profiles were generally similar although some adverse events were more common with upadacitinib.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The ORAL Surveillance trial found a dose-dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) events with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We aimed to assess VTE incidence over time and explore risk factors of VTE, including disease activity, in ORAL Surveillance.

Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or TNFi.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is a member of the JAK kinase family of intracellular signalling molecules. By participating in signalling pathways downstream of type I interferons, IL-12, IL-23 and IL-10, TYK2 elicits a distinct set of immune events to JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3. TYK2 polymorphisms have been associated with susceptibility to various rheumatic diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study was conducted to evaluate the interchangeability of an adalimumab biosimilar, PF-06410293 (adalimumab-afzb), with the reference drug, to enhance patient access to effective rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
  • The research involved a randomized, open-label design across 61 sites in ten countries, enrolling adults aged 18-70 with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who were stable on methotrexate.
  • The primary outcomes measured were the maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve, assessing whether the biosimilar can be considered equivalent to the reference drug based on specific pharmacokinetic criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib, are increasingly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There has been debate about their safety, particularly following the issuance of guidance by regulatory agencies advising caution in their use in certain patients. The registrational clinical trials and registry data of JAK inhibitors did not identify a difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), venous thromboembolism, malignancies or infections (other than herpes zoster) with a JAK inhibitor versus a biologic DMARD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of otilimab, an antigranulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: Two phase 3, double-blind randomised controlled trials including patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (contRAst 1) or conventional synthetic/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cs/bDMARDs; contRAst 2). Patients received background csDMARDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of otilimab, an anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic (cs) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or Janus kinase inhibitors.

Methods: ContRAst 3 was a 24-week, phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Patients received subcutaneous otilimab (90/150 mg once weekly), subcutaneous sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo for 12 weeks, in addition to csDMARDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Janus kinase inhibitors: efficacy and safety.

Curr Opin Rheumatol

November 2023

Rheumatology Associates, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been used since 2012 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who don't respond to traditional treatments, showing similar effectiveness and safety to biologics.
  • A recent clinical trial found that tofacitinib, one type of JAKi, had a higher incidence of major cardiovascular events and malignancy compared to TNF inhibitors, leading to safety concerns.
  • As a result, the FDA and EMA have restricted JAKi use to RA patients who have already tried and not succeeded with TNF inhibitors due to increased risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory skin and joint disease, affects approximately 0.27% of the adult population, and 20% of patients with psoriasis. Up to 10% of psoriasis patients are estimated for having undiagnosed PsA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance of Tofacitinib over 9 Years in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatol Ther

October 2023

Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Canada ULC, 17300 Trans-Canada Hwy, Kirkland, QC, H9J 2M5, Canada.

Introduction: The safety of tofacitinib in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been demonstrated in clinical studies of ≤ 4 and 9.5 years, respectively. Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for tofacitinib from spontaneous and voluntary adverse event (AE) reports have been published for RA, but not PsA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Preliminary evidence suggests that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may have some benefit in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, prior studies have been small and/or uncontrolled; this study aimed to address that gap.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled patients aged 18 to 75 years with active RA who had failed conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and were naïve to biologic and/or targeted synthetic DMARDs. All patients received an auricular vagus nerve stimulator and were randomized 1:1 to active stimulation or sham.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: One target of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve early sustained remission; over the long term, patients in sustained remission have less structural joint damage and physical disability. We evaluated Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission with abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate and impact of de-escalation (DE) in anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients with early RA.

Methods: The phase IIIb, randomized, AVERT-2 two-stage study (NCT02504268) evaluated weekly abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aims to assess the long-term safety of upadacitinib in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and atopic dermatitis (AD) by analyzing clinical trial data up to June 2021.
  • A total of 6,991 patients participated, revealing similar rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across diseases, although rates of serious TEAEs were notably higher in RA and PsA patients.
  • Overall, upadacitinib appears to be well tolerated, with some safety differences attributed to the characteristics of patients in each disease group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with/without conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs in RA.

Methods: The analyses evaluated two open-label extensions (OLEs): EXTEND and MONARCH OLE, which included patients from six randomized trials. Patients received sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) for at least 264 weeks up to 516 weeks (EXTEND: Sarilumab Monotherapy and Sarilumab + csDMARD groups) or for 276 weeks (MONARCH OLE: Continuation and Switch groups).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The efficacy of sarilumab and upadacitinib, in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), was demonstrated in phase 3 clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractive to previous biologic DMARDs. In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and simulated treatment comparison (STC) estimate the relative efficacy of sarilumab and upadacitinib in patients with RA who had an inadequate response to previous biologic DMARDs.

Methods: Patient-level data for sarilumab were obtained from the TARGET trial (NCT01709578) and published aggregate data for upadacitinib were obtained from the SELECT-BEYOND trial (NCT02706847).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate correlations between biomarkers of bone remodelling and extracellular matrix turnover with baseline disease activity and treatment response in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: ssessing ery arly heumatoid arthritis reatment-2 (AVERT-2; NCT02504268) included disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients randomised to weekly subcutaneous abatacept+methotrexate (MTX) or abatacept placebo+MTX for 56 weeks. This post hoc exploratory subanalysis assessed the association between baseline disease activity and eight biomarkers (Spearman's correlation coefficient), and whether baseline biomarkers (continuous or categorical variables) could predict treatment response at weeks 24 and 52 (logistic regression).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF