19 results match your criteria: "Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital[Affiliation]"
Arthritis Rheumatol
September 2024
Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the association of serum biomarkers with baseline psoriatic arthritis (PsA) disease activity, pharmacodynamic effects of deucravacitinib on biomarker levels, and the relationship between biomarkers and clinical responses to deucravacitinib.
Methods: The phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03881059) randomly assigned 203 patients with PsA 1:1:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib at 6 mg once daily (QD), or deucravacitinib at 12 mg QD.
Arthritis Res Ther
November 2019
AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Background: The ACR20 has been validated as the best discriminator of efficacy in placebo-controlled trials, but not in head-to-head trials comparing effective therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We assessed the most discriminatory ACR response and most discriminatory percent improvement in disease activity measures for Simplified Disease Activity index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity index (CDAI), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)) using different patient populations and trial designs.
Methods: Data from two placebo-controlled studies in established RA and two head-to-head studies in early RA were analyzed.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
October 2019
Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Med. Klinik und Poliklinik IV, University of Munich, Germany.
Objectives: Biologics, including tumour necrosis factor inhibitors such as adalimumab (ADA), have significantly improved outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because the clinical course of RA and response to therapy may be influenced by the genetic background of the patient, the objective of this retrospective parallel-assigned case-control analysis was to evaluate the associations between candidate genetic markers for RA with clinical and radiographic responses to ADA + methotrexate (MTX) or MTX monotherapy in the Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation with MTX and ADA (OPTIMA) study.
Methods: Three candidate genetic markers were tested: HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE), interleukin 4 receptor (IL4R) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1805010, and Fc gamma receptor IIb (FcgRIIb) SNP rs1050501.
RMD Open
April 2020
Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Objective: This analysis explored the association of treatment adherence with beliefs about medication, patient demographic and disease characteristics and medication types in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to develop adherence prediction models.
Methods: The population was a subset from ALIGN, a multicountry, cross-sectional, self-administered survey study in adult patients (n=7328) with six immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who were routinely receiving systemic therapy. Instruments included Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4), which was used to define adherence.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
May 2019
University Medical Center Carl Gustav Carus, and TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany On behalf of the SLE Classification Criteria Steering Committee.
Objectives: To compare responses in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initially treated with the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) adalimumab+methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy who may have continued receiving MTX or switched to adalimumab rescue therapy after inadequate response to MTX.
Methods: OPTIMA enrolled MTX-naive patients with active RA for <1 year. This post hoc analysis determined the proportion of patients, stratified by initial treatment, who achieved 28-joint modified Disease Activity Score based on C reactive protein <3.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
March 2018
University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Greece.
Objective: To review the published literature on the performance of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)-HEp-2 antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published between January 1990 and October 2015. The research question was structured according to Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) format rules, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were followed where appropriate.
Ann Rheum Dis
May 2017
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Objective: Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10-25 mg/week).
Lancet
December 2016
Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Background: To date, head-to-head trials comparing the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs within the same class, including TNF inhibitors, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two different TNF inhibitors and to assess the efficacy and safety of switching to the other TNF inhibitor without a washout period after insufficient primary response to the first TNF inhibitor at week 12.
Methods: In this 104-week, randomised, single-blind (double-blind until week 12 and investigator blind thereafter), parallel-group, head-to-head superiority study (EXXELERATE), eligible patients from 151 centres worldwide were aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis at screening, as defined by the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria, and had prognostic factors for severe disease progression, including a positive rheumatoid factor, or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody result, or both.
Ann Rheum Dis
April 2017
Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Objectives: To assess baricitinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis, who had insufficient response or intolerance to ≥1 tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) or other biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).
Methods: In this double-blind phase III study, patients were randomised to once-daily placebo or baricitinib 2 or 4 mg for 24 weeks. PROs included the Short Form-36, EuroQol 5-D, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), patient's assessment of pain, duration of morning joint stiffness (MJS) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Rheumatoid Arthritis.
J Rheumatol
September 2016
From the Immunology department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, California; the Medical Affairs department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania; the Biostatistics department and the Immunology department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA; Early Development, Janssen China Research and Development, Shanghai, China; the Biostatistics department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA; Rheumatology Department, M&M Centers LTD., Adazi, Latvia; Immunology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA; Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu; Rheumatology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria.R.L. Thurmond, PhD, Immunology Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; A. Greenspan, MD, Medical Affairs Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; W. Radziszewski, MD, PhD, Immunology Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; X.L. Xu, PhD, Immunology Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; Y. Miao, MS, Biostatistics Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; B. Chen, PhD, Early Development, Janssen China Research and Development; T. Ge, PhD, Biostatistics Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; B. Zhou, PhD, Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; D.G. Baker, MD, Immunology Department, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; D. Pavlova, MD, Rheumatology, M&M Centers Ltd.; C.T. Ritchlin, MD, Immunology Department, University of Rochester; Y. Tanaka, MD, PhD, Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health; T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Keio University Hospital; J.S. Smolen, MD, Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital.
Objective: To assess toreforant (selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist) in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: In a phase IIa, double-blind, placebo-controlled test, 86 patients were randomized (2:1) to once-daily toreforant 100 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. In phase IIb, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-range-finding evaluations, 272 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to once-daily placebo or toreforant 3/10/30 mg.
Arthritis Rheumatol
December 2016
AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).
Methods: Three hundred RA patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomly assigned equally to receive immediate-release ABT-494 at 3, 6, 12, or 18 mg twice daily, 24 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at week 12, as determined using the last observation carried forward method.
Background: Discordance between patient and physician ratings of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) severity occurs in clinical practice and correlates with pain scores and measurements of joint disease. However, information is lacking on whether discordance impacts patients' ability to work. We evaluated the discordance between patient and physician ratings of RA disease activity before and after treatment with etanercept and investigated the associations between discordance, clinical outcomes, and work productivity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthritis Res Ther
September 2015
Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Introduction: As patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receive treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factors over several years, it is important to evaluate their long-term safety and efficacy. The objective of this study was to examine the safety and benefits of certolizumab pegol (CZP)+methotrexate (MTX) treatment for almost 5 years in patients with RA.
Methods: Patients who completed the 24-week Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage (RAPID) 2 randomized controlled trial (RCT; NCT00160602), or who were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 non-responders at Week 16, entered the open-label extension (OLE; NCT00160641).
Ann Rheum Dis
August 2015
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Objectives: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate efficacy and safety of tabalumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX-IR).
Methods: 1041 patients with moderate-severe RA despite ongoing MTX enrolled in a 52-week study evaluating subcutaneous tabalumab 120 mg every four weeks (120/Q4W) or 90 mg every two weeks (90/Q2W) versus placebo. Primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index change from baseline at 24 weeks and modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) change at 52 weeks.
Lancet
March 2013
Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Background: Clinical remission and low disease activity are essential treatment targets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Although moderately active rheumatoid arthritis is common, treatment effects in moderate disease have not been well studied. Additionally, optimum use of biologics needs further investigation, including the use of induction, maintenance, and withdrawal treatment strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Rheum Dis
July 2013
Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Objectives: Tumour necrosis factor inhibition plus methotrexate is believed to inhibit radiographic progression independent of inflammation. This analysis assessed whether these protective effects are exerted on bone (joint erosion; JE) and/or cartilage (joint space narrowing; JSN), and what the independent effects of JE/JSN progression are on longer-term patient-reported outcomes.
Methods: PREMIER was a 2-year, randomised, controlled trial of adalimumab plus methotrexate (ADA+MTX) versus the monotherapies.
Arthritis Rheum
January 2011
Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Objective: To determine the effects of tocilizumab on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and remission assessment, using measures that do or do not comprise acute-phase reactants.
Methods: Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) scores, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores, and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were calculated using data from tocilizumab trials in patients with RA in whom disease had remained active despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The CDAI does not contain an acute-phase reactant component.
Lancet
July 2009
Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Vienna, Austria.
Background: Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors are frequently used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, but whether use of a different TNFalpha inhibitor can improve patient response is unknown. We assess the efficacy and safety of the TNFalpha inhibitor golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had previously received one or more TNFalpha inhibitors.
Methods: 461 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis from 82 sites in 10 countries were randomly allocated by interactive voice response system, stratified by study site and methotrexate use, to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (n=155), 50 mg golimumab (n=153), or 100 mg golimumab (n=153) every 4 weeks between Feb 21, 2006, and Sept 26, 2007.