The World Health Organization was born as a normative agency: Seventy-five years of global health law under WHO governance.

The World Health Organization (WHO) was born as a normative agency and has looked to global health law to structure collective action to realize global health with justice. Framed by its constitutional authority to act as the directing and coordinating authority on international health, WHO has long been seen as the central actor in the development and implementation of global health law. However, WHO has faced challenges in advancing law to prevent disease and promote health over the past 75 years, with global health law constrained by new health actors, shifting normative frameworks, and soft law diplomacy.

The impact of international health worker migration and recruitment on health systems in source countries: Stakeholder perspectives from Colombia, Indonesia, and Jordan.

Introduction: To address domestic shortages, high-income countries are increasingly recruiting health workers from low- and middle-income countries. This practice is much debated. Proponents underline benefits of return migration and remittances.

Counter-contestation in global health governance: The WHO and its member states in emergency settings.

Is the contestation of international institutions always a one-sided process that originates from nation-states? In research to date, there has been little discussion of the extent to which international institutions endure, or even form counter-reactions to national contestation strategies. This study examines the reasons for which WHO engages in counter-contestation vis-à-vis its member states. The paper analyzes the evolution of global health governance by relating a principal-agent approach and contestation considerations.

The Multilevel Dimension of Rules-Based Disease Surveillance beyond the State.

The timely availability of accurate information on disease outbreaks with a potential for cross-border spread is a global public good, allowing for a more effective preparedness and response. An ensuing question for national public health authorities is how such information is attained when it is gathered in territories beyond their jurisdiction. International and regional law norms emerge as an option for providing such a global public good.

[Cancer research: a privileged field of investigation on chance, reductionism and holism].

The debate between reductionism and anti-reductionism, dealing with the ultimate constituents of the world, is one of the fundamental issues in the philosophy of science. However, in biology, reductionism is less of an ontological and more of an epistemological question: it argues that the explanation of biological processes resides in deciphering the genetic code of living entities. This position is still prevalent in cancer biology, which has long been defined as a cellular process where genetic alterations are responsible for aberrant proliferation.