6 results match your criteria: "MA. Electronic address: jmaron@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.[Affiliation]"
Conversations With the Editors: Combating Caregiver and Patient-Perceived Obesity Stigmatization.
Clin Ther
July 2021
Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address:
Conversations With the Editors: The Past, Present, and Future of Placental Research at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Clin Ther
February 2021
Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:
Giving the Placenta the Respect It Deserves.
Clin Ther
February 2021
Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:
Healing a Broken Heart: Can Stem Cell and Gene Therapy Regenerate and Repair the Myocardium?
Clin Ther
October 2020
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:
The Shared Responsibility of Implementing Value-based Health Care.
Clin Ther
January 2020
Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 394, Boston, MA 02111, USA. Electronic address:
Computational gene expression modeling identifies salivary biomarker analysis that predict oral feeding readiness in the newborn.
J Pediatr
February 2015
Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Objective: To combine mathematical modeling of salivary gene expression microarray data and systems biology annotation with reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification to identify (phase I) and validate (phase II) salivary biomarker analysis for the prediction of oral feeding readiness in preterm infants.
Study Design: Comparative whole-transcriptome microarray analysis from 12 preterm newborns pre- and postoral feeding success was used for computational modeling and systems biology analysis to identify potential salivary transcripts associated with oral feeding success (phase I). Selected gene expression biomarkers (15 from computational modeling; 6 evidence-based; and 3 reference) were evaluated by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification on 400 salivary samples from successful (n = 200) and unsuccessful (n = 200) oral feeders (phase II).