5 results match your criteria: "Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation[Affiliation]"
Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation Presidential Address: the role of KIMEE as a medical education accreditation agency during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
J Educ Eval Health Prof
March 2021
President, Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, Seoul, Korea.
The "Glocalization" of Medical School Accreditation: Case Studies From Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan.
Acad Med
December 2017
M.J. Ho is professor, Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, and council member, Taiwan Medical Accreditation Council, Taipei, Taiwan; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-8282. J. Abbas was a research assistant, Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, at the time of the study. D. Ahn is professor, Department of Medical Humanities, College of Medicine Korea University, Seoul, Korea; vice president, World Federation for Medical Education, London, United Kingdom; and immediate past president, Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, Seoul, Korea; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-0026. C.W. Lai is immediate past chairman, Taiwan Medical Accreditation Council, and chair professor, Medical Education Promotion Fund, Taipei, Taiwan. N. Nara is director, Japan Accreditation Council for Medical Education, Tokyo, Japan. K. Shaw was a research assistant, Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, at the time of the study.
Purpose: In an age of globalized medical education, medical school accreditation has been hailed as an approach to external quality assurance. However, accreditation standards can vary widely across national contexts. To achieve recognition by the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME), national accrediting bodies must develop standards suitable for both local contexts and international recognition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas.
Aims: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards.
Beyond accreditation: excellence in medical education.
Med Teach
January 2014
Korea University Medical College, Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, Seoul , Korea.
Medical school accreditation is a relatively new phenomenon in Korea. The development of an accreditation body and standards for a two-tiered "Must" and "Should" system in 1997 eventually led to the implementation of a third "Excellence" level of attainment. These standards were conceived out of a desire to be able to first recognize and promote outstanding performance of medical schools, second to provide role models in medical education, and furthermore to preview the third level as potential components of the pre-existing second level for the next accreditation cycle.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF