19 results match your criteria: "Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California[Affiliation]"
Cancer Med
November 2024
Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: Rising metastatic prostate cancer incidence has renewed debate regarding benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Identifying barriers to accessing screening for individuals at high risk of lethal prostate cancer may slow this rise. We examined associations of access barriers with receipt of PSA testing, stratified by sociodemographic factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address:
Eur J Cancer
March 2024
Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; SERIO Registry (www.serio-registry.org); Department of Dermatology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and University Hospital Erlangen (UKER), Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI) and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC-ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address:
Cancer Discov
September 2021
T Cell Therapeutics Research Labs, Cellular Immunotherapy Center, Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells mediate potent antigen-specific antitumor activity; however, their indirect effects on the endogenous immune system are not well characterized. Remarkably, we demonstrate that CAR T-cell treatment of mouse syngeneic glioblastoma (GBM) activates intratumoral myeloid cells and induces endogenous T-cell memory responses coupled with feed-forward propagation of CAR T-cell responses. IFNγ production by CAR T cells and IFNγ responsiveness of host immune cells are critical for tumor immune landscape remodeling to promote a more activated and less suppressive tumor microenvironment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOpen Forum Infect Dis
November 2020
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background: Interleukin-6 blockade (IL-6) has become a focus of therapeutic investigation for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods: We report a case of a 34-year-old with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving an IL-6 receptor antagonist (IL-6Ra) who developed spontaneous colonic perforation. This perforation occurred despite a benign abdominal exam and in the absence of other known risk factors associated with colonic perforation.
Clin Cancer Res
January 2020
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Purpose: To report the 5-year overall survival (OS) landmark and the long-term safety profile of vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (BRAF plus MEK inhibition, respectively) in the BRIM7 study.
Patients And Methods: This phase Ib, dose-finding, and expansion study evaluated combination treatment with vemurafenib and cobimetinib in two cohorts of patients with advanced -mutated melanoma: patients who were BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi)-naïve ( = 63) or patients who had progressed on prior treatment with BRAFi monotherapy [vemurafenib monotherapy-progressive disease (PD); = 66]. Patients in the dose-escalation phase received vemurafenib at 720 or 960 mg twice daily in combination with cobimetinib at 60, 80, or 100 mg/d for 14 days on/14 days off, 21 days on/7 days off, or continuously.
Eur J Cancer
May 2019
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein and University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
JCO Precis Oncol
November 2018
William Lu, Luciana Burton, Ilsung Chang, Ivor Caro, Elicia Penuel, Yibing Yan, and Matthew J. Wongchenko, Genentech, South San Francisco; Antoni Ribas, The Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, CA; James Larkin, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Paul B. Chapman, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Paolo A. Ascierto, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy; Caroline Robert, Institut Gustave Roussy and Paris Sud University, Paris, France; Jeffrey A. Sosman, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; and Grant A. McArthur, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, and University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Purpose: We performed a retrospective exploratory analysis to evaluate the prognostic and predictive effect of two circulating biomarkers, mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating hepatocyte growth factor (cHGF), in metastatic melanoma.
Materials And Methods: This study evaluated patients from BRIM-3, a phase III trial comparing vemurafenib and dacarbazine in 675 patients with mutated advanced melanoma. ctDNA was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, and cHGF was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
JAMA Oncol
October 2018
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Importance: Prognostic models may provide insight into clinical trial results and inform the clinical management of patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma.
Objective: To identify subgroups with distinct survival outcomes based on clinical and genomic characteristics and to assess survival in identified prognostic subgroups across cohorts treated with dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective and exploratory recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) modeled associations between prespecified covariates and survival outcomes using pooled data from the BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM studies.
Melanoma Res
December 2017
aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advocate Medical Group - Oncology North, Park Ridge, Illinois bMelanoma Research Clinic, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado cDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia dDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona eDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri fDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee gDepartment of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York hDepartment of Medical Oncology, Texas Oncology, Dallas, Texas iDepartment of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California jDepartment of Immuno-Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles kDepartment of Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla lGenentech Inc., South San Francisco, California mMid Ohio Oncology and Hematology Inc., Columbus, Ohio nDepartment of Melanoma, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC oDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania pDepartment of Melanoma, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
BRAF mutations are found in ~50% of metastatic melanomas, most commonly in codon V600. Vemurafenib improves progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. The results of a descriptive study evaluating vemurafenib in patients with advanced melanoma harbouring BRAF mutations other than V600E are reported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Oncol
September 2016
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Background: The combination of cobimetinib with vemurafenib improves progression-free survival compared with placebo and vemurafenib in previously untreated patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant advanced melanoma, as previously reported in the coBRIM study. In this Article, we report updated efficacy results, including overall survival and safety after longer follow-up, and selected biomarker correlative studies.
Methods: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed BRAF(V600) mutation-positive unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive response system to receive cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period in each 28-day cycle) or placebo, in combination with oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily).
J Transl Med
July 2016
McGill University, MUHC Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC Canada
MELANOMA BRIDGE 2015 KEYNOTE SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS Molecular and immuno-advances K1 Immunologic and metabolic consequences of PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation in melanoma Vashisht G. Y. Nanda, Weiyi Peng, Patrick Hwu, Michael A.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Endod
November 2014
University of California, Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, California; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address:
Introduction: Revascularization of necrotic pulp has been successful in the resolution of periradicular inflammation; yet, several case studies suggest the need for cell-based therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as an alternative for de novo pulp regeneration. Because the availability of MSCs may be limited, especially in an aged population, the current study reports an alternative approach in generating MSCs from epidermal keratinocytes through a process called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).
Methods: We induced EMT in primary normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) by transient transfection of small interfering RNA targeting the p63 gene.
Lancet Oncol
August 2014
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address:
Background: Addition of a MEK inhibitor to a BRAF inhibitor enhances tumour growth inhibition, delays acquired resistance, and abrogates paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in preclinical models of BRAF-mutated melanoma. We assessed the safety and efficacy of combined BRAF inhibition with vemurafenib and MEK inhibition with cobimetinib in patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.
Methods: We undertook a phase 1b study in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma.
Background: In the BRIM-3 trial, vemurafenib was associated with risk reduction versus dacarbazine of both death and progression in patients with advanced BRAF(V600) mutation-positive melanoma. We present an extended follow-up analysis of the total population and in the BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation subgroups.
Methods: Patients older than 18 years, with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma and whose tumour tissue was positive for BRAF(V600) mutations were eligible.
J Oncol Pract
May 2009
University of California, Los Angeles, Schools of Medicine and Public Health; and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
As the population ages, maintaining the quality of care for new patients with cancer will be challenged by an anticipated shortage of health professionals to care for the increased number of newly diagnosed and surviving patients with cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Oncol
September 2005
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Purpose: Evidence suggests that the re-entry phase (ie, early period after medical treatment completion) presents distinct challenges for cancer patients. To facilitate the transition to recovery, we conducted the Moving Beyond Cancer (MBC) trial, a multisite, randomized, controlled trial of psychoeducational interventions for breast cancer patients.
Methods: Breast cancer patients were registered within 6 weeks after surgery.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
June 2002
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California-Los Angeles, Box 956900, Rm. A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA.
This article reviews the symptoms and everyday problems associated with tamoxifen adjuvant therapy and their impact on patients' quality of life. In addition, the purported toxic effects of tamoxifen therapy (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF