Managing chronic coronary syndrome: how do we achieve optimal patient outcomes?

Introduction: Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains the leading cause of death worldwide with high admission/re-admission rates. Medical databases were searched on CCS & its management.

Areas Covered: This review discusses phenotypes per stress-echocardiography, noninvasive/invasive testing (coronary computed-tomography angiography-CCTA; coronary artery calcium - CAC score; echocardiography assessing wall-motion, LV function, valvular disease; biomarkers), multidisciplinary management (risk factors/anti-inflammatory/anti-ischemic/antithrombotic therapies and revascularization), newer treatments (colchicine/ivabradine/ranolazine/melatonin), cardiac rehabilitation/exercise improving physical activity and quality-of-life, use of the implantable-defibrillator, and treatment with extracorporeal shockwave-revascularization for refractory symptoms.

Neurohumoral Activation in Heart Failure.

In patients with heart failure (HF), the neuroendocrine systems of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the arginine vasopressin (AVP) system, are activated to various degrees producing often-observed tachycardia and concomitant increased systemic vascular resistance. Furthermore, sustained neurohormonal activation plays a key role in the progression of HF and may be responsible for the pathogenetic mechanisms leading to the perpetuation of the pathophysiology and worsening of the HF signs and symptoms. There are biomarkers of activation of these neurohormonal pathways, such as the natriuretic peptides, catecholamine levels and neprilysin and various newer ones, which may be employed to better understand the mechanisms of HF drugs and also aid in defining the subgroups of patients who might benefit from specific therapies, irrespective of the degree of left ventricular dysfunction.

Inhibition of clot formation process by treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin in patients with carotid artery disease undergoing angioplasty and stenting. A thromboelastography study on whole blood.

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have become the corner stone of antithrombotic treatment but their administration protocol needs to be optimized for certain groups of patients. In this paper, we studied the influence of nadroparin treatment on clot formation process assessed by thromboelastography in patients with carotid artery disease undergoing angioplasty and stenting. Standard thromboelastography assays (in-TEM and ex-TEM) and minimal TF-triggered thromboelastography assay in citrated whole blood were performed in normal volunteers (n = 20), in patients with carotid artery disease receiving only antiplatelet treatment (n = 30), and in patients undergoing angioplasty receiving nadroparin 5750 anti-Xa IU s.