4 results match your criteria: "IVI Foundation - IIS La Fe Health Research Institute[Affiliation]"
Reprod Biomed Online
December 2023
IVI Foundation - IIS La Fe Health Research Institute, Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Torre A, Planta 1ª, Valencia. 46026, Spain.
Int J Mol Sci
May 2023
Reproductive Medicine Research Group, IVI Foundation-IIS La Fe Health Research Institute, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Mercury (Hg) cytotoxicity, which is largely mediated through oxidative stress (OS), can be relieved with antioxidants. Thus, we aimed to study the effects of Hg alone or in combination with 5 nM N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) on the primary endometrial cells' viability and function. Primary human endometrial epithelial cells (hEnEC) and stromal cells (hEnSC) were isolated from 44 endometrial biopsies obtained from healthy donors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReprod Biomed Online
April 2022
IVI Foundation - IIS La Fe Health Research Institute, Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Torre A, Planta 1ª, Valencia . 46026, Spain.
Research Question: Does magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) for sperm selection increase cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) or improve clinical parameters of reproductive success in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with donor oocytes?
Design: Retrospective multicentre observational study including data compiled from unselected couples who underwent ICSI cycles with donated oocytes in 15 Spanish IVIRMA fertility clinics (January 2008 to February 2020). Patients were divided into reference (standard semen processing, n = 40,157) and MACS (additional sperm selection step by MACS, n = 1,240) groups. CLBR were plotted on Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the Mantel-Cox test.
Biology (Basel)
May 2021
Andrology and Male Infertility Research Group, IVI Foundation-IIS La Fe Health Research Institute, Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Tower A, 1st Floor, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
The application of MACS non-apoptotic sperm selection in infertility clinics is controversial since the published literature does not agree on its effect on reproductive outcomes. Therefore, it is not part of the routine clinical practice. Classical measures of reproductive success (pregnancy or live birth rates per ovarian stimulation) introduce a bias in the evaluation of a technique's effect, since only the best embryo is transferred.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF