COMPARABLE OUTCOMES AFTER BUSULFAN- OR TREOSULFAN-BASED CONDITIONING FOR ALLO-HSCT IN CHILDREN WITH ALL-RESULTS OF FORUM.

The superiority of TBI-based versus chemotherapy-conditioning for allo-HSCT in children with ALL has been established in the international, prospective phase-III FORUM study (#NCT01949129), randomizing 417 patients ≤ 18 years at diagnosis (4-21 years at HSCT) in CR, transplanted from HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donors. Due to the unavailability of TBI in some regions and to accommodate individual contraindications, this study reports the pre-specified comparison of outcomes of patients receiving busulfan-based (BU) or treosulfan-based (TREO) regimens from 2013 to 2018. 180 and 128 patients (median age 9.

Ruxolitinib for pediatric patients with treatment-naïve and steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: the REACH4 study.

In REACH4, a phase 1/2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of ruxolitinib were evaluated in treatment-naïve and steroid-refractory pediatric patients with grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD; n = 45). Ruxolitinib dosing was based on age and targeted the exposure in adults receiving 10 mg twice daily; group 1 (aged ≥12 to <18 years) received 10 mg twice daily and preliminary starting doses for groups 2 (aged ≥6 to <12 years) and 3 (aged ≥2 to <6 years) were 5 mg twice daily and 4 mg/m2 twice daily, respectively. The phase 1 primary objective was to assess ruxolitinib PK parameters and define an age-appropriate recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for patients aged <12 years.