4 results match your criteria: "ErasmusMC University Medical Centre Rotterdam[Affiliation]"
BMJ Open
October 2019
University Neurosurgical Centre Holland, Leiden University Medical Centre, Haaglanden Medical Centre and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands.
Introduction: Controversy exists about the optimal treatment for patients with a traumatic acute subdural haematoma (ASDH) and an intracerebral haematoma/contusion (t-ICH). Treatment varies largely between different regions. The effect of this practice variation on patient outcome is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStud Health Technol Inform
December 2010
Department of Medical Informatics, ErasmusMC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Introducing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in general practice that provides broad support based on all available guidelines for preventive care might dramatically increase the workload of a general practitioner.
Aim: We evaluated the potential effect on workload of a CDSS that aims to support the whole breadth of preventive guidelines currently used in The Netherlands.
Methods: We analysed the guidelines of the Dutch college of General Practitioners (DCGP) for preventive activities, developed a CDSS based on the guidelines and studied the behaviour of the system on real patient data.
Circulation
January 2008
Department of Medical Informatics, ErasmusMC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Indirect evidence shows that alerting users with clinical decision support systems seems to change behavior more than requiring users to actively initiate the system. However, randomized trials comparing these methods in a clinical setting are lacking. We studied the effect of both alerting and on-demand decision support with respect to screening and treatment of dyslipidemia based on the guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Decis Making
June 2006
Department of Medical Informatics, ErasmusMC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Objective: To identify the possible inconsistency of statements among the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (DCGP) with respect to the management of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of all electronically available DCGP practice guidelines dealing with CVD risk factor management for statement inconsistencies and reference inconsistencies.
Results: Six DCGP guidelines out of 74 electronically available guidelines had either CVD or CVD risk factors as the subject of the guideline.