Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use.

Species detections often vary depending on the survey methods employed. Some species may go undetected when using only one approach in community-level inventory and monitoring programs, which has management and conservation implications. We conducted a comparative study of terrestrial mammal and bird detections in the spring and summer of 2021 by placing camera traps at 30 locations across a large military installation in northern Michigan, USA and testing replicate soil samples from these sites for environmental DNA (eDNA) using an established vertebrate metabarcoding assay.

Comparison of qPCR and metabarcoding for environmental DNA surveillance of a freshwater parasite.

Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has been successfully used across freshwater ecological parasitology to inform management of ecologically and economically important species. However, most studies have used species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays to detect target taxa. While generally effective, this approach limits the amount of community and management-supporting data that can be obtained from eDNA samples.