3 results match your criteria: "Dongwon Cancer Specialized Care Hospital[Affiliation]"
Postoperative Urinary Complications in Minimally Invasive vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Ureterovaginal Fistula.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongwon Cancer Specialized Care Hospital, ILSANRO 439 ILSANDONG-GU GOYANG CITY, GYEONGGI-DO, 10359, Republic of Korea.
Article Synopsis
- This study compares postoperative urologic complications between minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
- A systematic review of 35 studies found that MIRH is linked to a significantly higher risk of complications, especially ureterovaginal fistula.
- The findings suggest a need for careful patient selection and potential improvements in surgical techniques to minimize these risks.
Meta-analysis reveals higher intraoperative urologic complication rates in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Int J Surg
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongwon Cancer Specialized Care Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Background: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) has been increasingly adopted for its benefits of reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the incidence of intraoperative urologic complications, including bladder and ureteral injuries, between MIRH and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).
Method: The authors systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 2024.
Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
J Gynecol Oncol
January 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongwon Cancer Specialized Care Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Objective: Survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) remain controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate survival outcomes between RRH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Methods: Studies comparing between RRH and LRH published up to November 2022 were systemically searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases.