7 results match your criteria: "Department of Veterans Affairs Health Economics Resource Center[Affiliation]"

Effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed, and pre-clinical data suggest alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists (α-AR antagonists) may be effective in reducing mortality related to hyperinflammation independent of etiology. Using a retrospective cohort design with patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system, we use doubly robust regression and matching to estimate the association between baseline use of α-AR antagonists and likelihood of death due to COVID-19 during hospitalization. Having an active prescription for any α-AR antagonist (tamsulosin, silodosin, prazosin, terazosin, doxazosin, or alfuzosin) at the time of admission had a significant negative association with in-hospital mortality (relative risk reduction 18%; odds ratio 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Impact: Diabetic Patient 5-Year Coronary Artery Bypass Clinical Outcomes.

Ann Thorac Surg

January 2019

Research and Development Office, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs, Denver, Colorado; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Background: For diabetic patients who require coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation, controversy persists whether an off-pump or an on-pump approach may be advantageous. This US-based, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, Department of Veterans Affairs Randomization On versus Off Bypass Follow-up Study, compared diabetic patients' 5-year clinical outcomes for off-pump versus on-pump procedures.

Methods: From 2002 to 2008, 835 medically treated (ie, oral hypoglycemic agent or insulin) diabetic patients underwent either off-pump (n = 402) or on-pump (n = 433) CABG.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of Primary Care Intensive Management on High-Risk Veterans' Costs and Utilization: A Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.

Ann Intern Med

June 2018

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, California, and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (D.M.Z., S.M.A.).

Background: Primary care models that offer comprehensive, accessible care to all patients may provide insufficient resources to meet the needs of patients with complex conditions who have the greatest risk for hospitalization.

Objective: To assess whether augmenting usual primary care with team-based intensive management lowers utilization and costs for high-risk patients.

Design: Randomized quality improvement trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study assessed whether an organizational factor, delays to claim acceptance or administrative delays, had an influence on outcomes for individuals with acute back injuries in the workers' compensation system.

Methods: Multivariate logistic regression was used to test whether individuals who experienced administrative delays were more likely to develop chronic disability than those who did not experience delays.

Results: Beyond the first 2 weeks, each interval of administrative delay was associated with increased odds of developing chronic disability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prescription drug co-payments and cost-related medication underuse.

Health Econ Policy Law

January 2008

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Economics Resource Center, Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, USA.

Co-payments have been linked to the slowing growth in pharmaceutical spending over the last five years. However, patients with health problems frequently have difficulty affording their pharmacotherapy and fail to take their medication as prescribed. We examine the relationship between co-payment amounts and four types of cost-related underuse: taking fewer doses, postponing taking a medication, failing to fill a prescription at all, and taking medication less frequently than prescribed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Behavioral health interventions are often gauged with a dichotomous outcome, "success" or "failure." Hidden by this dichotomy is a series of behavior changes that can be followed with the Transtheoretical Model (stages of change). There has been little consideration, however, about whether this information can and should be used in cost-effectiveness analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF