12 results match your criteria: "Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit[Affiliation]"
Br J Gen Pract
May 2004
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester.
We report an analysis of the qualitative phase of a study of patients' and carers' views of primary care services, focusing on their experiences of access to face-to-face general practitioner (GP) consultations during the period when new access policies were being implemented. Practices interpreted the new policy in various ways; restricted interpretations, including restriction of access to telephone booking, could cause distress to patients. Patients and carers welcomed flexible interpretations of the policy that offered choice, such as a choice of GP, or of booking in advance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScand J Prim Health Care
December 2003
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, UK.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of feedback on the number of pathology tests ordered by general practices.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: General practices in two primary care groups in Leicestershire, UK.
Qual Saf Health Care
October 2003
University of Leicester School of Medicine, Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
BMJ
June 2003
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW. Tarrant
Objectives: To explore patients' perceptions of the features of personal care and how far these are shared by healthcare providers; whether a continuing relationship between a health professional and a patient is essential for personal care; and the circumstances in which a continuing relationship is important.
Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews using the "framework" approach.
Setting: Six general practices in Leicestershire.
Nurse Educ Today
May 2003
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Aim: The aims of this study were (a) to devise a set of prioritised criteria of consultation competence which primary care nurses need to acquire and (b) to determine the face and content validity of these criteria.
Method: The criteria of consultation competence as contained in the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP) were modified for use with primary care nurses and sent to a stratified sample of UK primary care nurses (n=1126) to determine their face and content validity.
Results: Support for the seven categories of consultation competence varied from 93-98% and for the 39 component competences from 88-98%.
Br J Gen Pract
September 2001
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW.
Background: Various methods are available for implementing change in the clinical behaviour of general practitioners (GPs). Although passive dissemination of information is generally ineffective, other methods can be variably effective. Few studies have investigated the impact of tailored methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Adv Nurs
August 2001
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Leicester Warwick Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Aims: This paper reports on the methods used in two studies to obtain access to subjects to comply with the common law duty of confidence laid out in the Data Protection Act (1998) and discusses the researchers' problems in interpreting the procedures.
Rationale: The amendments to the United Kingdom (UK) Data Protection Act (1998) are causing confusion within the health service and academic institutions. There is a need to balance patient confidentiality with the requirement to conduct vital, unbiased research in which health service professionals are not subject to ethical dilemmas.
Br J Gen Pract
May 2001
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester.
Background: There is now clear evidence that tight control of blood glucose and blood pressure significantly lowers the risk of complications in both type I and type II diabetes. Although there is evidence that primary care can be as effective as secondary care in delivering care for people with diabetes, standards in primary care are variable. Previous studies have shown that practice, patient or organisational factors may influence the level of care of patients with diabetes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFam Pract
February 2001
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Background: In quality improvement activities such as audit, some general practices succeed in improving care and some do not. With audit of care likely to be one of the major tools in clinical governance, it would be helpful to establish what features of primary health care teams are associated with successful audit in general practice.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to identify those features of primary health care teams that were associated with successful quality improvement during systematic audit of diabetes care.
Br J Gen Pract
November 2000
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester.
Postgrad Med J
July 2000
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Autopsies represent a key instrument in educating doctors and may aid quality assurance for primary and secondary care. This study shows that only a few patients have an autopsy, of which the majority are carried out at the request of the coroner for medicolegal reasons. Better education and communication between general practitioners, hospital clinicians, pathologists, and coroners may increase the rate of autopsies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ
July 1999
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW.