74 results match your criteria: "Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics[Affiliation]"
Clin Chest Med
September 2015
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University, 1120 W Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health Methodist Hospital, 1701 North Senate Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. Electronic address:
Clinicians working in the intensive care unit (ICU) confront death and dying daily. ICU care can be inconsistent with a patient's values, preferences, and previously expressed goals of care. Current evidence promotes the integration of palliative care services within the ICU setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Educ
March 2016
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ann Am Thorac Soc
March 2015
1 Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Resuscitation programs such as Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Cardiac Life Support, Pediatric Advanced Life Support, and the Neonatal Resuscitation Program offer inadequate guidance to physicians who must ultimately decide when to stop resuscitation efforts. These decisions involve clinical and ethical judgments and are complicated by communication challenges, group dynamics, and family considerations. This article presents a framework, summarized in a mnemonic (CEASE: Clinical Features, Effectiveness, Ask, Stop, Explain), for how to stop resuscitation efforts and communicate that decision to clinicians and ultimately the patient's family.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Geriatr Soc
November 2014
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Unbefriended, incapacitated individuals who lack surrogates to make medical decisions present a complex problem to the healthcare providers who treat them. Adults without surrogates are among the most vulnerable in the community and are often alone and estranged from family, neglected and abused, and at risk of receiving inappropriate medical treatment. This article describes the program model and outcomes for the first 2 years of the Wishard Volunteer Advocates Program (WVAP), a guardianship program using trained, supervised volunteers as surrogates for unbefriended, incapacitated individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOncology (Williston Park)
November 2013
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA.
Liver Transpl
February 2014
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine.
The disparity between the demand for and supply of donor livers has continued to grow over the last 2 decades, and this has placed greater weight on the need for efficient and effective liver allocation. Although the use of extended criteria donors has shown great potential, it remains unregulated. A survival benefit-based model was recently proposed to answer calls to increase efficiency and reduce futile transplants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOncology (Williston Park)
July 2013
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis USA.
J Oncol Pract
July 2013
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN.
The aim of this annotated bibliography about important articles in the field of ethics and oncology is to provide the practicing hematologist/oncologist with a brief overview of some of the important literature in this crucial area.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOncology (Williston Park)
April 2013
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA.
Nurs Outlook
June 2014
Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN; Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address:
Background: Oncology nurses have opportunities to engage in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer but encounter barriers that impede the patient's understanding of prognosis, delay transitions to end-of-life care, and contribute to nonbeneficial treatments.
Purpose: To describe nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer.
Method: Thematic analysis of audio-recorded interviews with oncology nurses (n = 27).
Oncology (Williston Park)
November 2012
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park)
October 2012
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park)
October 2012
The Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park)
September 2012
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park)
September 2012
The Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park)
September 2012
The Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics at Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Cancer Nurs
January 2014
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Background: Oncology nurses routinely encounter ethical dilemmas when caring for advanced cancer patients, particularly concerning prognosis-related communications. Nurses experience uncertainty and barriers to providing quality end-of-life care; thus, more information is needed about recognizing and managing these dilemmas and to clarify their role in these situations.
Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the frequency and types of ethical dilemmas experienced by oncology nurses caring for advanced cancer patients and (2) to summarize their written comments about prognosis-related communications.
J Adv Nurs
January 2013
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Aim: To report the development and psychometric testing of the Moral Distress Thermometer. The Moral Distress Thermometer is a new screening tool to measure moral distress in nurses who practise in the hospital setting.
Background: Moral distress occurs when one knows the ethically correct thing to do, but is prevented from acting on that perceived obligation.
Acad Emerg Med
November 2011
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, Occupational, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics at Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, USA.
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul
September 2010
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics and Clarian Health, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Unit-based ethics conversations (UBECs) provide nurses with an opportunity for meaningful conversation about the ethical issues they face in routine clinical practice. The goal of the program is to increase participants' abilities and confidence in dealing with ethically challenging situations. This article reviews results from a formal evaluation of UBECs at one organization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Law Med Ethics
February 2009
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Clarian Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
The concept of brain death--first defined decades ago--still presents medical, ethical, and legal challenges despite its widespread acceptance in clinical practice and in law. This article reviews the medicine, law, and ethics of brain death, including the current inconsistencies in brain death determinations, which a lack of standardized federal policy promotes, and argues that a standard brain death policy to be used by all hospitals in all states should be created.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProg Transplant
June 2008
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Context: Although medical factors clearly dominate the evaluation of appropriateness for liver transplant, psychosocial factors are an important dimension in the evaluation process.
Objective: To understand more about the weight assigned to psychosocial factors in the decision to list patients for liver transplant and about whether such differences create hidden inequities in the transplant allocation system.
Design: We conducted a mail survey of liver transplant surgeons and psychosocial evaluators at busy transplant centers assessing the importance these professionals assigned to psychosocial factors in evaluations for liver transplant candidacy.
J Am Coll Surg
December 2007
Department of Medicine, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.