37 results match your criteria: "Centre for Guidelines.[Affiliation]"
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
November 2024
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Arch Dis Child
December 2024
Paediatric Audiology Department, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK.
Objective: To systematically assess the modifiable risk factors for developing otitis media with effusion (OME) in children under 12 years.
Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, INAHTA database, CENTRAL, CDSR and Epistemonikos for cohort studies with ≥40 children per arm/prognostic factor, published in English from 2000 to November 2022. We assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies checklist, and overall evidence quality was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Value Health
June 2024
Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address:
Pharmacoecon Open
May 2024
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Background: Long-term conditions (LTCs) are major public health problems with a considerable health-related and economic burden. Modelling is key in assessing costs and benefits of different disease management strategies, including routine monitoring, in the conditions of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care.
Objective: This review aimed to identify published model-based cost-effectiveness studies of routine laboratory testing strategies in these LTCs to inform a model evaluating the cost effectiveness of testing strategies in the UK.
Pharmacoecon Open
September 2023
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Centre for Guidelines, London, UK.
Pharmacoecon Open
September 2023
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Centre for Guidelines, London, UK.
Background: An economic model was developed with guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 'Managing Common Infections' (MCI) Committee to evaluate the cost effectiveness of different antibiotic treatment sequences for treating Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in England.
Methods: The model consisted of a 90-day decision tree followed by a lifetime cohort Markov model. Efficacy data were taken from a network meta-analysis and published literature, while cost, utility and mortality data were taken from published literature.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
May 2023
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Background: People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require intensive follow-up with frequent consultations after diagnosis. IBD telehealth management includes consulting by phone, instant messenger, video, text message, or web-based services. Telehealth can be beneficial for people with IBD, but may have its own set of challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Paediatr Open
May 2023
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Objectives: Babies born between 27 and 31 weeks of gestation represent the largest group of very preterm babies requiring National Health Service (NHS) care; however, up-to-date, cost figures for the UK are not currently available. This study estimates neonatal costs to hospital discharge for this group of very preterm babies in England.
Design: Retrospective analysis of resource use data recorded within the National Neonatal Research Database.
ERJ Open Res
March 2023
Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
BMJ
March 2023
Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Objective: To determine whether the withdrawal of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scheme in primary care in Scotland in 2016 had an impact on selected recorded quality of care, compared with England where the scheme continued.
Design: Controlled interrupted time series regression analysis.
Setting: General practices in Scotland and England.
Lung Cancer
April 2023
Lung Cancer and Thoracic Surgery Directorate, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.
BMJ Evid Based Med
February 2023
Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background: Network meta-analysis (NMA) is increasingly used in guideline development and other aspects of evidence-based decision-making. We aimed to develop a risk of bias (RoB) tool to assess NMAs (RoB NMA tool). An international steering committee recommended that the RoB NMA tool to be used in combination with the Risk of Bias in Systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJOG
September 2022
Division of Population Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Objective: What are the costs, benefits and harms of immediate birth compared with expectant management in women with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 34 -36 weeks of gestation and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus (GBS)?
Design: Mathematical decision model comprising three independent decision trees.
Setting: UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective.
Population: Women testing positive for GBS with PPROM at 34 -36 weeks of gestation.
J Clin Epidemiol
April 2022
Guidelines International Network (GIN), Guidelines Collaboration Working Group; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Objective: Collaboration between groups can facilitate the development of high-quality guidelines. While collaboration is often desirable, misunderstandings can occur. One method to minimize misunderstandings is the pre-specification of terms of engagement in a memorandum of understanding (MOU).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Public Health
July 2021
Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
An important requirement for successful public health interventions is a standardized classification in order to make these health technologies comparable in all contexts and recognized by all parties. The WHO International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI), including an integrated public health component, has been developed to propose such an international standard. To test (a) the translation of public health interventions to ICHI codes and (b) the technical handling and general coding in public health, we used a set of public health interventions from a recent cross-sectional survey among Health Technology Assessment professionals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRes Synth Methods
November 2020
Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
Introduction And Aim: NICE guideline surveillance determines whether previously published guidelines need updating. The surveillance process must balance time constraints with methodological rigor. It includes a rapid review to identify new evidence to contradict, reinforce or clarify guideline recommendations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJPsych Bull
August 2020
Medical Student, University of Exeter, UK.
Trials
June 2020
Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool (a member of Liverpool Health Partners), Liverpool, UK.
Background: It is increasingly accepted that insufficient attention has been given to the patient health outcomes that are important to measure in comparative effectiveness research that will inform decision-making. The relationship between outcomes chosen for comparative effectiveness research, outcomes used in decision-making in routine care, and outcome data recorded in electronic health records (EHR) is also poorly understood. The COMET Initiative (http://www.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Health Monit
June 2020
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Centre for Guidelines.
Br J Surg
July 2020
Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf)
May 2020
Health and Social Care Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK. SW1A 2BU.
BMJ
January 2020
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.
In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Public Health (Oxf)
November 2020
Health and Social Care Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK. SW1A 2BU.
This article covers recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance and standards relevant to public health with a focus on behaviour change. The article summarizes recommendations for local commissioners and providers to help them tackle a range of behaviours including smoking, poor eating patterns, lack of physical activity and alcohol misuse.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Eval Clin Pract
December 2019
Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
NICE's guideline on shared decision making, currently under development, endeavours to support shared decision making as part of routine health care practice. In this article, we summarize our learning to date, gained through the scoping of the guideline, on the key challenges that need to be addressed in the guideline. The production of a scope is the first stage in the development of a NICE guideline, setting the parameters for what will be considered in the guideline.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPublic Health
April 2019
Office of Health Economics, Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6QT, UK.
Background: Reviews of economic evaluations of public health (PH) interventions assessed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the periods 2005-2010 and 2011-2016 have been undertaken. This study combines these analyses, adds six further guidelines published since then, and thus provides a summary of cost-effectiveness of NICE's PH interventions to the present.
Methods: As in previous studies, economic evaluations carried out between 2005 and 2018 were categorised by the type of economic analysis used to extract and summarise base-case ICERs.