29 results match your criteria: "Centre Norbert Elias[Affiliation]"

Vocal recruitment for joint travel in wild chimpanzees.

PLoS One

July 2014

Centre Norbert Elias, EHESS, Marseille, France ; School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom ; Anthropological Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ; Budongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.

Joint travel is a common social activity of many group-living animals, which requires some degree of coordination, sometimes through communication signals. Here, we studied the use of an acoustically distinct vocalisation in chimpanzees, the 'travel hoo', a signal given specifically in the travel context. We were interested in how this call type was produced to coordinate travel, whether it was aimed at specific individuals and how recipients responded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Behavioral differences observed between wild communities of the same species have been called "cultures" by some researchers who aimed to underline the similarities with human cultures. However, whether these differences truly result from social learning processes is debated. Despite promising recent research, data acquired in the wild still fail to exclude genetic and ecological factors from being potential explanations for the observed behavioral differences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Animal cultures are controversial because the method used to isolate culture in animals aims at excluding genetic and environmental influences rather than demonstrating social learning. Here, we analyzed these factors in parallel in captivity to determine their influences on tool use. We exposed Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii) orphans from tool-using and non-tool-using regions (western swamps and eastern Langkat, respectively) that differed in both genetic and cultural backgrounds to a raking task and a honey-dipping task to assess their understanding of stick use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Disclosing overall scientific results to clinical trial participants has become an ethical obligation. Here we studied how participants understand these results in view of their experience of clinical trials and illness in general and what modes of disclosure they preferred. Interviews were conducted with 29 breast cancer patients in France during 2009, using an in-depth qualitative approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF