38 results match your criteria: "Center on Social Disparities in Health.[Affiliation]"
J Am Diet Assoc
December 2009
Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
Background/objective: Children of Mexican descent frequently experience household food insecurity both in the United States and Mexico. However, little is known about the associations of food insecurity with dietary intake. This study aimed to understand the level of perceived food insecurity and its association with dietary intake among children of Mexican descent residing in the United States and Mexico.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatrics
November 2009
Center on Social Disparities in Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St, San Francisco, CA 94118-0943, USA.
In this article we argue for the utility of the life-course perspective as a tool for understanding and addressing health disparities across socioeconomic and racial or ethnic groups, particularly disparities that originate in childhood. Key concepts and terms used in life-course research are briefly defined; as resources, examples of existing literature and the outcomes covered are provided along with examples of longitudinal databases that have often been used for life-course research. The life-course perspective focuses on understanding how early-life experiences can shape health across an entire lifetime and potentially across generations; it systematically directs attention to the role of context, including social and physical context along with biological factors, over time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMatern Child Health J
January 2010
Center on Social Disparities in Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
To describe income levels and the prevalence of major hardships among women during or just before pregnancy. We separately analyzed 2002-2006 population-based postpartum survey data from California's Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (n = 18,332) and 19 states participating in CDC's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (n = 143,452) to examine income and several hardships (divorce/separation, domestic violence, homelessness, financial difficulties, spouse/partner's or respondent's involuntary job loss or incarceration, and, in California only, food insecurity and no social support) during/just before pregnancy. In both samples, over 30% of women were poor (income =100% of federal poverty level [FPL]) and 20% near-poor (101-200% FPL); and around 60% of low-income (poor or near-poor) women experienced at least one hardship.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPublic Health Rep
January 2008
Center on Social Disparities in Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900, USA.
Objectives: Income data are often missing for substantial proportions of survey participants and these records are often dropped from analyses. To explore the implications of excluding records with missing income, we examined characteristics of survey participants with and without income information.
Methods: Using statewide population-based postpartum survey data from the California Maternal and Infant Health Assessment, we compared the age, education, parity, marital status, timely prenatal care initiation, and neighborhood poverty characteristics of women with and without reported income data, overall, and by race/ethnicity/nativity.
J Epidemiol Community Health
November 2007
Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, Department of Family and Community Medicine, California 94143-0900, USA.
Scand J Public Health
June 2006
Center on Social Disparities in Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0900, USA.
Aims: To determine whether neighborhood-level deprivation is independently associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) health behaviors/risk factors in the Swedish population.
Methods: Pooled cross-sectional data, Swedish Annual Level of Living Survey (1996-2000) linked with indicators of neighborhood-level (i.e.
Annu Rev Public Health
June 2006
Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0900, USA.
There is little consensus about the meaning of the terms "health disparities," "health inequalities," or "health equity." The definitions can have important practical consequences, determining the measurements that are monitored by governments and international agencies and the activities that will be supported by resources earmarked to address health disparities/inequalities or health equity. This paper aims to clarify the concepts of health disparities/inequalities (used interchangeably here) and health equity, focusing on the implications of different definitions for measurement and hence for accountability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA
December 2005
Center on Social Disparities in Health and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0900, USA.
Problems with measuring socioeconomic status (SES)-frequently included in clinical and public health studies as a control variable and less frequently as the variable(s) of main interest-could affect research findings and conclusions, with implications for practice and policy. We critically examine standard SES measurement approaches, illustrating problems with examples from new analyses and the literature. For example, marked racial/ethnic differences in income at a given educational level and in wealth at a given income level raise questions about the socioeconomic comparability of individuals who are similar on education or income alone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Epidemiol
February 2006
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health
December 2005
Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Am J Public Health
December 2004
Center on Social Disparities in Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900, USA.
Objective: We explored methods and potential applications of a systematic approach to studying and monitoring social disparities in health and health care.
Methods: Using delayed or no prenatal care as an example indicator, we (1) categorized women into groups with different levels of underlying social advantage; (2) described and graphically displayed rates of the indicator and relative group size for each social group; (3) identified and measured disparities, calculating relative risks and rate differences to compare each group with its a priori most-advantaged counterpart; (4) examined changes in rates and disparities over time; and (5) conducted multivariate analyses for the overall sample and "at-risk" groups to identify particular factors warranting attention.
Results: We identified at-risk groups and relevant factors and suggest ways to direct efforts for reducing prenatal care disparities.
J Health Popul Nutr
September 2003
Center on Social Disparities in Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU-3E, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900, USA.
This paper aims at articulating a conceptual framework for monitoring equity in health and healthcare. The focus is on four main questions: What is health equity? What is monitoring? What are the essential components of a system for monitoring health equity? and Why monitor health equity? Monitoring equity in health and healthcare requires comparing indicators of health and its social determinants among social groups with different levels of underlying social advantage, i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBull World Health Organ
October 2003
Department of Family and Community Medicine and Center on Social Disparities in Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0900, USA.
Those concerned with poverty and health have sometimes viewed equity and human rights as abstract concepts with little practical application, and links between health, equity and human rights have not been examined systematically. Examination of the concepts of poverty, equity, and human rights in relation to health and to each other demonstrates that they are closely linked conceptually and operationally and that each provides valuable, unique guidance for health institutions' work. Equity and human rights perspectives can contribute concretely to health institutions' efforts to tackle poverty and health, and focusing on poverty is essential to operationalizing those commitments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF