330 results match your criteria: "Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health[Affiliation]"

Turning CMS into a Health Technology Assessment Organization.

N Engl J Med

August 2023

From the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston (P.J.N., S.R.T.); and Rubix Health, Baltimore (S.R.T.).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The benefits of preventive interventions lack comprehensive evaluation in standard health technology assessments (HTA), particularly for rare and transmissible diseases. To identify possible considerations for future HTA using analogies between the treatment and prevention of rare diseases. An Expert panel meeting assessed whether one HTA assessment framework can be applied to assess both rare disease treatments and preventive interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pediatric Genomic Medicine: Value, Implementation, and Access.

Clin Ther

August 2023

PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Author Reply.

Value Health

October 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The impact of external reference pricing on pharmaceutical costs and market dynamics.

Health Policy Open

December 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St. #063, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

Growth in the cost of prescription drugs in the US has generated significant interest in the use of external reference pricing (ERP) to tie prices paid for drugs to those in other countries. We used data from the Pricentric ONE™ database, an international drug pricing database, to examine product launch timing, launch price, and price changes from January 2010 - October 2021 in both ERP and non-ERP settings, with a focus on 100 high-priced drugs of interest to Medicare and Medicaid. We found that ERP policies were associated with a 73% reduction in the likelihood of drug launch within 9 months of regulatory approval relative to non-ERP settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Specialty drug coverage varies between health plans' medical and pharmacy benefit policies.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm

June 2023

The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

In an effort to control drug spending, health plans are increasingly shifting specialty drugs from their medical benefit to the pharmacy benefit. One consequence of this trend is that some health plans have both a medical and a pharmacy coverage policy for the same drug. To examine how frequently health plans issue medical and pharmacy benefit policies for the same specialty drug and to evaluate the concordance between plans' medical and pharmacy policies when plans issue both policy types.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A review of HTA guidelines on societal and novel value elements.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care

May 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) organizations vary in terms of how they conduct assessments. We assess whether and to what extent HTA bodies have adopted societal and novel elements of value in their economic evaluations.

Methods: After categorizing "societal" and "novel" elements of value, we reviewed fifty-three HTA guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: No consensus exists on the ideal methodology to evaluate the economic impact and value of new, potentially curative gene therapies. We aimed to identify and describe published methodologic recommendations for the economic evaluation of gene therapies and assess whether these recommendations have been applied in published evaluations.

Methods: This study was conducted in three stages: a systematic literature review of methodologic recommendations for economic evaluation of gene therapies; an assessment of the appropriateness of recommendations; and a review to assess the degree to which the recommendations were applied in published evaluations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate how menu calorie labeling could help reduce cancer cases related to obesity in the US population.
  • Using a cost-effectiveness model, it analyzed the effects of this policy on consumer habits and food industry changes among 235 million adults aged 20 and older.
  • Results showed that just by changing consumer behavior, the policy could prevent thousands of cancer cases and deaths, save billions in medical costs, and yield significant overall cost savings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Developing Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation Tool.

Value Health

August 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • A new quality assessment tool for cost-effectiveness analyses was created to overcome limitations of existing guidelines, focusing on both methods and reporting quality attributes.
  • The tool was developed through a rigorous process involving a scoping review, an online survey of 524 participants, and statistical analysis, leading to the identification of 48 key quality attributes.
  • Key findings highlighted that attributes related to modeling and data inputs are crucial for methods quality, while detailed model descriptions are important for reporting quality, though equity considerations were considered less important.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Biosimilars have been introduced with the goal of competing with high-priced biologic therapies, yet their adoption has been slower than expected and resulted in limited efficiency gains. We aimed to explore factors associated with biosimilar coverage relative to their reference products by commercial plans in the United States (US).

Methods And Data: We identified 1181 coverage decisions for 19 commercially available biosimilars, corresponding to 7 reference products and 28 indications from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The association between US Food and Drug Administration-expedited review designations and health plan specialty drug coverage.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm

May 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) speeds approval of important clinical advancements through 4 expedited review programs: Priority Review, Accelerated Approval, Fast Track, and Breakthrough Therapy. Whether health plans prioritize coverage of expedited drugs relative to drugs that the FDA determined did not qualify from these programs is unclear. To investigate how fast US commercial health plans issued coverage policies for drugs included in different numbers of FDA-expedited programs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Bipolar disorder is associated with functional impairment and diminished health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this study was to estimate the annual per patient direct healthcare costs, indirect costs, and HRQoL of patients with bipolar disorder by depressive symptom severity and overall compared to the general population in the US.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used self-reported data from the 2020 US National Health and Wellness Survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Commercial health plans use of patient subgroup restrictions: An analysis of orphan and US Food and Drug Administration-expedited programs.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm

May 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Health plans apply utilization management criteria to guide their enrollees' access to prescription drugs. Patient subgroup restrictions (ie, clinical prerequisites for drug coverage) are a form of utilization management that have not been thoroughly investigated. To examine the frequency with which large US commercial health plans impose patient subgroup restrictions beyond the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label in their coverage policies for orphan drugs and for drugs included in 1 or more FDA-expedited programs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Variation in Medicaid and commercial payer coverage of aducanumab for Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimers Dement

August 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Introduction: Ever since the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aducanumab and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) restricted coverage for the drug, a crucial question has been how other payers will behave. This study examined how Medicaid and commercial plans cover aducanumab.

Methods: We created a database of aducanumab coverage policies issued by Medicaid fee-for-service programs (50 states and DC) and 35 of the largest commercial plans (covering ∼ 84% of the commercially insured population).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Following a review of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in the literature, existing PRO instruments may not adequately capture the experience of receiving treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Therefore, this study aimed to develop a de novo instrument to comprehensively assess the patient experience of PDR.

Methods: This qualitative, mixed-methods study comprised item generation for the Diabetic Retinopathy-Patient Experience Questionnaire (DR-PEQ), content validation in patients with PDR, and preliminary Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analyses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Examining US commercial health plans' use of The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's reports in specialty drug coverage decisions.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm

March 2023

The Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) has emerged in a visible role in US health care. However, it is unclear to what extent US commercial health plans use ICER value assessments in their specialty drug coverage decisions. To evaluate the relationship between ICER's reported cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and coverage restrictiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient and Caregiver Views on Measures of the Value of Health Interventions.

Patient Prefer Adherence

December 2022

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate patient and caregiver views on the relative importance of traditional and nontraditional domains of value, and to determine if these views differed according to key demographic characteristics.

Patients And Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi approach using a web-based survey of adult patients managing a chronic condition or caregivers of a patient with chronic illness who were recruited using purposive sampling focused on demographic and clinical characteristics. The first survey round asked participants to rate the 13 domains of value on a 5-point Likert scale and rank each domain that they rated as important or very important.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Value of New: Consideration of Product Novelty in Health Technology Assessments of Pharmaceuticals.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy

March 2023

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, #063, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.

Background: Efforts to understand how treatments affect patients and society have broadened the criteria that health technology assessment (HTA) organizations apply to value assessments. We examined whether HTA agencies in eight countries consider treatment novelty in methods and deliberations.

Methods: We defined a novel pharmaceutical product to be one that offers a new approach to treatment (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Pediatric genomic sequencing (GS) can impact the health of both children and families, highlighting the need for an understanding of caregivers' perspectives on its utility.
  • This study involved semi-structured interviews with 41 caregivers to identify factors influencing their decisions to pursue GS for their pediatric patients, focusing on family-level issues.
  • The analysis revealed four key domains affecting caregivers' decision-making: underlying values, perceived benefits, perceived risks, and practical considerations, which can enhance future assessments of pediatric GS's value to families.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Assessing medical technologies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) creates challenges for current methods of value assessment. New value assessment approaches for AD are also needed.

Methods: We adapted concepts from health economics to help guide decision makers to more informed decisions about AD therapies and diagnostics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Alzheimer's disease is a complex illness with ongoing research focused on new treatments, particularly those targeting amyloid-beta, which is essential to its development.
  • A study surveyed caregivers, neurologists, and payors in the U.S. to evaluate their preferences for treatment options using a multicriteria decision analysis, which broke down various decision factors and preferences.
  • Results showed that all stakeholder groups prioritized drug efficacy and the benefits to patients, while cost considerations were deemed less significant in the decision-making process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF