13 results match your criteria: "Center for Pain Control[Affiliation]"
J Pain
November 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. However, over- or underdelivery of the SCS may occur because the spacing between the stimulating electrodes and the spinal cord is not fixed; spacing changes with motion and postural shifts may result in variable delivery of the SCS dose and, in turn, a suboptimal therapy experience for the patient. The evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-a measure of neural activation-may be used as a control signal to adapt SCS parameters in real time to compensate for this variability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
December 2023
Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Headache is a leading cause of disability and suffering. One major challenge in developing device treatments is demonstrating their efficacy given devices' often-high placebo rate. This paper reviews the importance of validating sham devices as part of finalizing the design for larger-scale prospective randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic headache as well as the results of a prospective, single-blind trial to validate two potential sham noninvasive thermal nerve block devices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMinerva Anestesiol
October 2021
Pain Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Neurosurg Focus
February 2016
Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and.
OBJECTIVE In this study the authors describe the technical considerations and feasibility of transforaminal discectomy and foraminoplasty for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy in patients who have herniated discs at the thoracolumbar junction. METHODS After institutional review board approval, charts from 3 consecutive patients with lumbar radiculopathy and T12-L1 herniated discs who underwent endoscopic procedures between 2006 and 2014 were reviewed. RESULTS Consecutive cases (n = 1316) were reviewed to determine the incidence and success of surgery performed at the T12-L1 level.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Physician
October 2015
Brown University, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Center for Pain Control, Brick, NJ.
Background: Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and foraminotomy is a well-described minimally invasive technique for surgically treating lumbar radiculopathy caused by a herniated disc and foraminal narrowing.
Objective: To describe the technique and feasibility of transforaminal foraminoplasty for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy in patients who have already undergone instrumented spinal fusion.
Study Design: Retrospective study.
Pain Physician
September 2015
Center for Pain Control, Brick, NJ; 2Brown University, Providence, RI.
Background: Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is a common entity and occurs mainly in elderly patients. The trend in surgery has been to offer decompression with instrumented fusion based on patient-based outcome data and the inherent instability of the condition.
Objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and foraminotomy is an ultra-minimally invasive outpatient surgical option available to patients that does not require general anesthesia and does not involve the same amount of destabilizing facet joint removal as a traditional laminectomy and medial facetectomy.
R I Med J (2013)
June 2014
Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at Hasbro Children's Hospital and Associate Professor of Neurosurgery at the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence RI.
Background: Endoscopic discectomy is an ultra- minimally invasive outpatient surgical option for the treatment of lumbar herniated discs. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of tranforaminal versus interlaminar endoscopic discectomy in patients with single level Lumbar 5-Sacral 1(L5-S1) disc herniations and lumbar radiculopathy.
Methods: After Institutional Review Board Approval, charts from 41 consecutive patients with complaints of lower back and radicular pain and an L5-S1 herniated disc who underwent an endoscopic procedure between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
April 2014
Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA. Electronic address:
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
October 2013
Center for Pain Control, Brick, USA.
Objective: Transforaminal endoscopic surgery has evolved from an intradiscal procedure to a true foraminal epidural procedure where both a targeted discectomy and foraminal decompression can be performed. The success of transforaminal decompression for radiculopathy using preoperative selective nerve root block as part of a treatment algorithm for single level and multilevel lumbar disc herniations is described here.
Methods: After Institutional Review Board Approval, charts from 195 patients with complaints of lower back and radicular pain who received one or more endoscopic discectomy procedures were reviewed.
Pain Physician
January 2013
Center for Pain Control, Brick, NJ, USA
Microsurgery for lumbar herniated discs that require surgical intervention is a very successful and well-described technique, whether performed through more traditional "open" microsurgical retractors or through minimally-invasive "tube" retractors. Surgery for extruded lumbar disc fragments that migrate caudad or cephalad from the disc origin may typically require modifying the standard hemilaminotomy by removing additional laminar bone to retrieve the migrated fragment. Although midline and paramedian Wiltse approaches have been the standard methods for resecting herniated lumbar disc fragments, advances in neuroendoscopic techniques have expanded the potential targets for transforaminal endoscopic treatment to include extruded lumbar disc fragments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Physician
January 2012
Center for Pain Control, Garland, TX 75042, USA.
Background: Variation in the intensity of neurostimulation with body position is a practical problem for many patients implanted with a spinal cord stimulation system because positional changes may result in overstimulation or understimulation. These posture-related changes in patients' perception of paresthesia can affect therapeutic outcomes of spinal cord stimulation therapy. An accelerometer-based algorithm that automatically adjusts spinal cord stimulation based on sensed body position or activity represents a potential solution to the problem of position-mediated variations in paresthesia perception.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuromodulation
July 2010
Center for Pain Control, Garland, TX, USA; John Sasaki, M.D., Inc., Pomona, CA, USA; Medical Advanced Pain Specialists (MAPS), Applied Research Center, Edina, MN, USA; and Medtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation devices control energy by generating either constant voltage (CV) pulses or constant current (CC) pulses. This study aimed to investigate: 1) whether patients feel differences between CV and CC stimulation; 2) if patients prefer CV or CC stimulation.
Methods: Fourteen patients blinded to the type of pulse generation received 20 randomized pairs of 15-sec pulse trains (CC-CV, CV-CC, CV-CV, or CC-CC).
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
March 1988
Center for Pain Control, San Antonio, Texas.
Initially, the Center for Pain Control designed and implemented multiple measures to indicate treatment efficacy in an outpatient setting. Decreased use of medical care at 1 year after treatment was one of five measures used. Economic concerns, both in the health and the insurance industries, mandated greater emphasis on cost effectiveness at a primary success determinate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF