10 results match your criteria: "Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing[Affiliation]"
Australas J Dermatol
January 2025
The Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Background: Recent Australian trends indicate that shave biopsies for diagnosing lesions suspicious of melanoma are increasing, yet reasons for this remain relatively unknown. We sought to understand which factors influence Australian clinicians' use of shave biopsy for managing thin lesions suspicious of melanoma in sites of low cosmetic sensitivity.
Methods: We used a convergent, exploratory mixed-methods design, with a cross-sectional online survey (n = 59) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 15).
Semin Oncol Nurs
October 2024
Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Objectives: Amidst the fulfilment of making a positive impact on patients' lives, cancer nurses also contend with high workloads, limited resources, and barriers to career advancement. Understanding the perceptions of cancer nurses is essential in addressing these challenges and fostering an environment that promotes both professional satisfaction and optimal patient care. Our aim was to explore Australian cancer nurses' experiences and perspectives of workforce challenges and their proposed solutions to address them.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Dermatol
November 2024
Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Background: Research suggests that a high proportion of melanoma in situ (MIS) may be overdiagnosed, potentially contributing to overtreatment, patient harm and inflated costs for individuals and healthcare systems. However, Australia-wide estimates of the magnitude of melanoma overdiagnosis are potentially outdated and there has been no estimation of the cost to the healthcare system.
Objectives: To estimate the magnitude and cost of overdiagnosed MIS and thin invasive melanomas in Australia.
J Cancer Surviv
May 2024
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose: This study aimed to systematically map elements of care and respective outcomes described in the literature for different models of post-treatment care for survivors of childhood cancer.
Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase were searched with combinations of free text terms, synonyms, and MeSH terms using Boolean operators and are current to January 2024. We included studies that described post-treatment cancer survivorship models of care and reported patient or service level elements of care or outcomes, which we mapped to the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework domains.
BMC Nurs
December 2023
Cancer Nurses Society of Australia, Gabbadah, WA, Australia.
Background: To maintain and improve the quality of the cancer nursing workforce, it is crucial to understand the factors that influence retention and job satisfaction. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of cancer nurses in Australia and identify predictors of job satisfaction.
Methods: We analysed data from an anonymous cross-sectional survey distributed through the Cancer Nurses Society Australia membership and social media platforms from October 2021 to February 2022.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
March 2022
Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand have the highest incidence of melanoma and KC in the world. We undertook a cost-of-illness analysis using Markov decision-analytic models separately for melanoma and keratinocyte skin cancer (KC) for each country. Using clinical pathways, the probabilities and unit costs of each health service and medicine for skin cancer management were applied.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSupport Care Cancer
May 2022
Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to establish research and infrastructure priorities for cancer survivorship.
Methods: A two-round modified online Delphi study was completed by Australian experts in cancer survivorship. Initial priorities were generated from the literature and organized into four research categories: physiological outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, population groups, and health services; and one research infrastructure category.
PEC Innov
December 2022
Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Objective: We assessed the acceptability of, and perceived benefits/barriers to, using Electronic health (eHealth) technology for childhood cancer survivorship care.
Methods: We interviewed survivors, their parents, and their nominated GP. We described a hypothetical eHealth tool to manage survivorship care and asked their likely use of, and perceived benefits/concerns for, the use of the tool.
BMC Med Res Methodol
August 2021
Queensland University of Technology, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Brisbane, Australia.
Background: Variations in clinical practice contribute to negative outcomes for children with cancer. Research in this area is imperative to standardise practice, yet such research is challenging to undertake, and a significant proportion of studies fail. A common reason for failure is poor recruitment, yet little information is available to support researchers and clinicians planning such research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSupport Care Cancer
August 2020
Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.