4 results match your criteria: "Brooklyn College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York[Affiliation]"
Alcohol
May 2019
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.
The acquired motivational impact of conditioned stimuli has been studied using the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task, where a cue paired with a reward is consistently shown to energize responses separately trained with that same reward ("specific" PIT). However, most alcohol studies have shown that alcohol-related cues elevate responses trained with either the same alcohol reward or with other non-alcoholic rewards ("general" PIT). The effects of extinction on this alcohol PIT effect have not been fully explored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLearn Mem
October 2018
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 11210, USA.
When discrete localizable stimuli are used during appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, "sign-tracking" and "goal-tracking" responses emerge. Sign-tracking is observed when conditioned responding is directed toward the CS, whereas goal-tracking manifests as responding directed to the site of expected reward delivery. These behaviors seem to rely on distinct, though overlapping neural circuitries, and, possibly, distinct psychological processes as well, and are thought to be related to addiction vulnerability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuropsychologia
January 2016
Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, 150 Muir Rd. (126R), Martinez, CA 94553, United States; University of California, Davis, United States.
While left hemisphere damage (LHD) has been clearly shown to cause a range of language impairments, patients with right hemisphere damage (RHD) also exhibit communication deficits, such as difficulties processing prosody, discourse, and social contexts. In the current study, individuals with RHD and LHD were directly compared on their ability to interpret what a character in a cartoon might be saying or thinking, in order to better understand the relative role of the right and left hemisphere in social communication. The cartoon stimuli were manipulated so as to elicit more or less formulaic responses (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChemSusChem
September 2015
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padua (Italy).