17 results match your criteria: "BGU Hospital[Affiliation]"

Background: Foot deformities in children are common, and the majority can be treated conservatively. Nevertheless, there are deformities that require surgical treatment. These include rigid clubfeet, severe forms of pes planovalgus, pes cavus and several more.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans (JOCD) is a common reason for knee pain among children. The aim of this case study was to report on clinical and radiographic outcomes after fixation of an osteochondral fragment with bioabsorbable pins in children with open growth plates. We hypothesized that surgical treatment with this technique will result in good function, high rates of radiographic healing and high return to sport rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a common procedure used to treat patients with patellofemoral instability (PFI) and osteoarthritis (PFOA). Medial patellar maltracking due to previous excessive medialization of the tibial tubercle has rarely been reported. Therefore, the goal of this study was to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after revision osteotomy with lateralization of the tibial tubercle (RL-TTO) to correct medial patellofemoral maltracking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Corona again? SSC after a severe COVID-disease.

Z Gastroenterol

December 2021

Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Gastroent., Hepatologie u. Stoffwechsel, Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.

Secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) is a severe complication of intensive care treatment in critically ill patients. It is characterized by rapid onset and severe chlolestasis with elevation of gGT. In contrast to primary sclerosing cholangitis, SSC-CIP has a distinct and timely well defined trigger and can have a rapid progress to cirrhosis and liver failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To validate the Dutch version of AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).

Methods: Patients were recruited from two level-1 trauma centers from the Netherlands. Next to the AOSpine PROST, patients also filled out SF-36 for concurrent validity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To report on the development of AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) and results of an initial reliability study.

Methods: The AOSpine CROST was developed using an iterative approach of multiple cycles of development, review, and revision including an expert clinician panel. Subsequently, a reliability study was performed among an expert panel who were provided with 20 spine trauma cases, administered twice with 4-week interval.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Multicenter validation study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) into English, and test its psychometric properties among North-American spine trauma patients.

Summary Of Background Data: In the absence of an outcome instrument specifically designed and validated for traumatic spinal column injury patients, it is difficult to measure the effect size of various treatment options.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Expert opinion.

Objectives: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are of increasing medical importance. For an adequate treatment strategy, an easy and reliable classification is needed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To report on the multi-phase process used in developing the AOSpine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (AOSpine PROST), as well as the results of its application in a pilot study.

Methods: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) methodology was used as the basis for the development of this tool. Four preparatory studies and a consensus conference were performed, and resulted in the selection of 25 core ICF categories as well as the scale for use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate whether wide variations are seen in the measurement techniques preferred by spine surgeons around the world to assess traumatic fracture kyphosis and vertebral body height loss (VBHL).

Methods: An online survey was conducted at two time points among an international community of spine trauma experts from all world regions. The first survey (TL-survey) focused on the thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar spine, the second survey (C-survey) on the subaxial cervical spine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Besides a patient reported outcome measure, the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma aims to develop a new concept of a surgeon reported outcome measure (SROM) for spine trauma patients. This study aims to identify parameters that spine surgeons consider relevant to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of thoracic and lumbar spine trauma patients.

Methods: An international cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among spine surgeons from the five AOSpine International world regions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: International web-based survey.

Objective: To identify clinical and radiological parameters that spine surgeons consider most relevant when evaluating clinical and functional outcomes of subaxial cervical spine trauma patients.

Summary Of Background Data: Although an outcome instrument that reflects the patients' perspective is imperative, there is also a need for a surgeon reported outcome measure to reflect the clinicians' perspective adequately.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Toward the Development of a Universal Outcome Instrument for Spine Trauma: A Systematic Review and Content Comparison of Outcome Measures Used in Spine Trauma Research Using the ICF as Reference.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

February 2016

*Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands†Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands‡Rehabilitation Center "De Hoogstraat," Utrecht, The Netherlands§Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands¶Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA||Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA**Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada††Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada‡‡Center for Spinal Surgery, BGU-Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany§§Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India¶¶Department of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University and Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Study Design: A systematic literature review.

Objective: The aim of this study was (1) to identify patient-reported and clinician-based outcome measures most frequently used to evaluate the function and health of spine trauma patients, (2) to identify and quantify the concepts of these measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as reference, and (3) to describe their clinimetric properties.

Summary Of Background Data: There is a real need for a disease-specific outcome instrument to measure the effect size of various treatment options in a variety of traumatic spinal column injuries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Toward developing a specific outcome instrument for spine trauma: an empirical cross-sectional multicenter ICF-based study by AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

September 2015

*Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands †Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore ‡Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa §Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ¶Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ‖Center for Spinal Surgery, BGU-Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany **Rehabilitation Center 'De Hoogstraat', Utrecht, the Netherlands ††Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands ‡‡Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India §§Department of Orthopaedics, Catholic University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil; and ¶¶Department of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Study Design: Empirical cross-sectional multicenter study.

Objective: To identify the most commonly experienced problems by patients with traumatic spinal column injuries, excluding patients with complete paralysis.

Summary Of Background Data: There is no disease or condition-specific outcome instrument available that is designed or validated for patients with spine trauma, contributing to the present lack of consensus and ongoing controversies in the optimal treatment and evaluation of many types of spine injuries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • MSCs (mesenchymal stromal cells) are versatile cells that can differentiate into various types, and high levels of CD146 on MSCs from bone marrow suggest stronger potential for becoming bone cells.
  • The study focused on MSCs isolated from human placentas to see if the expression of CD146 similarly correlates with osteogenic (bone-forming) potential.
  • Results showed that placental MSCs expressing CD146 demonstrated a greater ability to form mineralized bone matrix compared to those without CD146, while other differentiation pathways (adipogenic and chondrogenic) were not affected by CD146 expression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Towards the development of an outcome instrument for spinal trauma: an international survey of spinal surgeons.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

January 2015

*Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands †Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ‡Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD §Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA ¶Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ‖Center for Spinal Surgery, BGU-Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany **Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; and ††Department of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Study Design: International web-based survey.

Objective: To identify the most relevant aspects of human function and health status from the perspective of health care professionals involved in the treatment of spinal trauma patients.

Summary Of Background Data: There is no universally accepted outcome instrument available that is specifically designed or validated for spinal trauma patients, contributing to controversies related to the optimal treatment and evaluation of many types of spinal injuries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Three-dimensional navigation is more accurate than two-dimensional navigation or conventional fluoroscopy for percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation in the dysmorphic sacrum: a randomized multicenter study.

J Orthop Trauma

December 2014

*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA; †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA; ‡Orthopaedic Trauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; §Department of Trauma and Restorative Surgery, BGU Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; ‖Clinic of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany; ¶Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; **AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Dübendorf, Switzerland; and ††Clinic for Trauma Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted sacral screw fixation compared with conventional techniques in the dysmorphic versus normal sacrum.

Design: Review of a previous study database.

Setting: Database of a multinational study with 9 participating trauma centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF