13 results match your criteria: "Australia. anna.williamson@saxinstitute.org.au.[Affiliation]"

Background: Early childhood social and emotional development underpins later social, emotional, academic and other outcomes. The first aim of this study was to explore the association between child, family and area-level characteristics associated with developmental vulnerability, amongst Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children in their first year of school. The second aim was to quantify the magnitude of the social and emotional developmental inequalities between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children and the extent to which differences in socioeconomic disadvantage and perinatal characteristics explained this inequality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Much has been written about the use of evidence in policy; however, there is still little known about whether and how research is engaged with and used in policy development or the impact of reported barriers and facilitators. This paper aims to (1) describe the characteristics of 131 policy documents, (2) describe the ways in which research was engaged with (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers are a potential method for producing more relevant research with greater potential to impact on policy and practice. Little is known about how such partnerships are enacted in practice, however, or how to increase their effectiveness. We aimed to determine why researchers and policy-makers choose to work together, how they work together, which partnership models are most common, and what the key (1) relationship-based and (2) practical components of successful research partnerships are.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The paper discusses the SPIRIT trial, which aimed to improve how health policy agencies in Sydney use research evidence in their decision-making processes, focusing on feasibility, acceptability, and overall impact.
  • The trial involved six health policy agencies, using a structured intervention over one year that included training, system testing, and collaboration with researchers; outcomes were measured every six months for two and a half years.
  • Results showed significant improvements in agencies' research capacity and staff confidence, indicating that while the changes were not always statistically significant, the intervention had a generally positive effect on research engagement in policy-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In this paper, we identify and respond to the fidelity assessment challenges posed by novel contextualised interventions (i.e. interventions that are informed by composite social and psychological theories and which incorporate standardised and flexible components in order to maximise effectiveness in complex settings).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy.

Health Res Policy Syst

January 2016

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

Background: Evidence-informed policymaking is more likely if organisations have cultures that promote research use and invest in resources that facilitate staff engagement with research. Measures of organisations' research use culture and capacity are needed to assess current capacity, identify opportunities for improvement, and examine the impact of capacity-building interventions. The aim of the current study was to develop a comprehensive system to measure and score organisations' capacity to engage with and use research in policymaking, which we entitled ORACLe (Organisational Research Access, Culture, and Leadership).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research impact: neither quick nor easy.

BMC Med

October 2015

The Sax Institute, Level 13 Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Greenhalgh and Fahy's paper about the 2014 Research Excellence Framework provides insights into the challenges of assessing research impact. Future research assessment exercises should consider how best to include measurement of indirect and non-linear impact and whether efforts in knowledge transfer and co-production should be explicitly recognised. Greenhalgh and Fahy's findings also demonstrate that the structure of the assessment exercise can privilege certain kinds of research and may therefore miss some research that has a high impact on policy and practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Using conjoint analysis to develop a system of scoring policymakers' use of research in policy and program development.

Health Res Policy Syst

August 2015

School of Marketing, University of South Australia, Level 4, Yungondi Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.

Background: The importance of utilising the best available research evidence in the development of health policies, services, and programs is increasingly recognised, yet few standardised systems for quantifying policymakers' research use are available. We developed a comprehensive measurement and scoring tool that assesses four domains of research use (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Using conjoint analysis to develop a system to score research engagement actions by health decision makers.

Health Res Policy Syst

April 2015

School of Marketing, University of South Australia, Level 4, Yungondi Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.

Background: Effective use of research to inform policymaking can be strengthened by policymakers undertaking various research engagement actions (e.g., accessing, appraising, and applying research).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Usage of an online tool to help policymakers better engage with research: Web CIPHER.

Implement Sci

April 2015

Sax Institute, Level 13, Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Background: There is a need to develop innovations that help policymakers better engage with research in order to increase its use in policymaking. As part of the Centre for Informing Policy in Health with Evidence from Research (CIPHER), we established Web CIPHER, an online tool with dynamic interactive elements such as hot topics, research summaries, blogs from trusted figures in health policy and research, a community bulletin board, multimedia section and research portal. The aim of this study was to examine policymakers' use of the website, and determine which sections were key drivers of use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the acceptability and face validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Aboriginal community controlled health services (ACCHOs) located in the greater Sydney region.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in three ACCHOs located within the greater Sydney region in 2008-2009. A semi-structured approach was used in focus groups and small group interviews (n = 47) to elicit participants' views on the appropriateness of the SDQ and any additional issues of importance to Aboriginal child and adolescent mental health.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore emerging themes related to the mental health of Aboriginal children and adolescents ("young people") arising from focus groups conducted in Sydney, New South Wales.

Design, Setting And Participants: A qualitative study was conducted between April 2008 and September 2009 in three Aboriginal community-controlled health organisations in Sydney. A semi-structured approach was used in focus groups and small group interviews to elicit the views of 15 Aboriginal parents and 32 Aboriginal workers from a variety of health and social work backgrounds on important factors surrounding the mental health of Aboriginal young people.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of baseline cocaine use on treatment outcomes for heroin dependence over a 24-month period.

Design: A longitudinal cohort (24 months) study was carried out. Interviews were conducted at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF