1,013 results match your criteria: "American Society of Clinical Oncology.[Affiliation]"

Combustible tobacco use has reached historic lows, demonstrating the importance of proven strategies to reduce smoking since publication of the 1964 Surgeon General's report. In contrast, the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), specifically e-cigarettes, has grown to alarming rates and threatens to hinder progress against tobacco use. A major concern is ENDS use by youth and adults who never previously used tobacco.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Combustible tobacco use has reached historic lows, demonstrating the importance of proven strategies to reduce smoking since publication of the 1964 Surgeon General's report. In contrast, the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), specifically e-cigarettes, has grown to alarming rates and threatens to hinder progress against tobacco use. A major concern is ENDS use by youth and adults who never previously used tobacco.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

Results: Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigated the performance of 192 oncology practices in delivering oral chemotherapy measures as part of ASCO's Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) in 2017 and 2018.
  • It compared the performance between certified (26%) and non-certified (74%) practices, finding certified practices were more likely to provide education about clinic contact instructions.
  • Overall, there was significant variability in how practices implemented oral chemotherapy measures, indicating a need for improved standards tailored to the unique challenges of oral treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative.

JCO Oncol Pract

December 2022

Maryland Oncology Hematology PA, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Bethesda, MD.

Purpose: To investigate implicit bias (IB) in the peer review process across ASCO and Conquer Cancer Foundation and to propose potential mitigation strategies.

Materials And Methods: We, ASCO Working Group on Implicit Bias, selected four data sources: (1) literature search [(a) defining IB in peer review, (b) evidence of IB in peer review, and (c) strategies to mitigate IB]; (2) created and analyzed an ASCO database for sex, race, and institutional affiliation regarding peer review success; (3) constructed and conducted qualitative interviews of key stakeholders within the ASCO board, publications, and grants committee, on experience with IB within ASCO; and (4) constructed, delivered, and analyzed results of member survey on perception of IB within ASCO.

Results: Historically uncommon, PubMed articles on IB in peer review subsequently increased exponentially in the past 2 decades.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hybrid controlled trials with real-world data (RWD), where the control arm is composed of both trial and real-world patients, could facilitate research when the feasibility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is challenging and single-arm trials would provide insufficient information.

Methods: We propose a frequentist two-step borrowing method to construct hybrid control arms. We use parameters informed by a completed randomized trial in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to simulate the operating characteristics of dynamic and static borrowing methods, highlighting key trade-offs and analytic decisions in the design of hybrid studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To update resource-stratified, evidence-based recommendations on secondary prevention of cervical cancer globally.

Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel to produce recommendations reflecting four resource-tiered settings. A review of existing guidelines, formal consensus-based process, and modified ADAPTE process to adapt existing guidelines was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Treatment goals for patients with metastatic cancer include prolongation and maintenance of quality of life. Patients and oncologists have questioned the current paradigm of initial dose selection for systemic therapy; however, data on oncologists' dose selection strategies and beliefs are lacking.

Methods: We conducted an electronic international survey of medical oncologists who treat patients with breast and/or gastrointestinal cancers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on integrative approaches to managing pain in patients with cancer.

Methods: The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040.

Breast

December 2022

Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, and its burden has been rising over the past decades. In this article, we examine and describe the global burden of breast cancer in 2020 and predictions for the year 2040.

Methods: Estimates of new female breast cancer cases and deaths in 2020 were abstracted from the GLOBOCAN database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reply to K.L. Campbell et al.

J Clin Oncol

January 2023

Jennifer A. Ligibel, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Kari Bohlke, ScD, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Catherine M. Alfano, PhD, Northwell Health Cancer Institute and Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, New York, NY.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research biopsies included in cancer clinical trials have the goal of advancing scientific understanding of the biological bases of cancer and its treatments, but may offer no prospect of direct benefit to participants and often pose more than minimal risk. The research community is examining the ethics of research biopsies increasingly often, especially when they are mandatory for study participation but do not support primary study objectives and thus are "nonintegral" to the study. Ethical concerns center on the limited scientific justification supporting some biopsies, risks to research participants, and the potential for coercion and therapeutic misconception during the informed consent process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Understanding risks for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and subsequent mortality among patients with cancer may help inform treatment decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: CancerLinQ is an electronic health record database from US oncology practices. We identified a cohort of patients with malignancy and 2+ encounters at CancerLinQ practices in the 12 months before the study period (January 1, 2020-January 31, 2021).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The text discusses updated evidence-based recommendations for treating patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer without driver mutations.
  • It summarizes new findings based on a systematic review of clinical trials conducted between 2018 and 2021, which influence treatment options and safety considerations.
  • The updated guidelines provide various therapeutic options based on PD-L1 expression levels, tumor type, and patient performance status, incorporating both monotherapy and combination therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2021 ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver alterations.

Methods: ASCO updated recommendations on the basis of an ongoing systematic review of randomized control trials from 2020 to 2021.

Results: This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF