1,013 results match your criteria: "American Society of Clinical Oncology.[Affiliation]"
Purpose: To provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]).
Methods: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review.
Results: Sixty-one studies form the evidence base.
J Am Med Inform Assoc
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, United States.
Objective: Data extraction from the published literature is the most laborious step in conducting living systematic reviews (LSRs). We aim to build a generalizable, automated data extraction workflow leveraging large language models (LLMs) that mimics the real-world 2-reviewer process.
Materials And Methods: A dataset of 10 trials (22 publications) from a published LSR was used, focusing on 23 variables related to trial, population, and outcomes data.
J Clin Oncol
January 2025
Jefferson Einstein Medical Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Purpose: To evaluate evidence on germline and somatic genomic testing for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and provide recommendations.
Methods: A systematic review by a multidisciplinary panel with patient representation was conducted. The PubMed database was searched from January 2018 to May 2024.
J Clin Oncol
January 2025
Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of pleural mesothelioma (PM).
Methods: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pathology, cancer genetics, and advocacy experts to conduct an updated literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2016 through 2024. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life.
J Clin Oncol
January 2025
Aaron J. Scott, MD, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Erin B. Kennedy, MHSc, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Sepideh Gholami, MD, MAS, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY.
Br J Cancer
January 2025
School of Dental Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
J Clin Oncol
December 2024
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Purpose: To provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians who treat patients with stage I-III anal cancer.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature conducted by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center provided the evidence base for this guideline. An ASCO Expert Panel reviewed this evidence and came to consensus on a set of evidence-based recommendations.
J Natl Cancer Inst
December 2024
Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Breast Cancer Res
November 2024
Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Background: To assess proportions of metastatic recurrence in women initially diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer by stage at diagnosis, breast cancer subtype, calendar period and age.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Web of Science databases (January 2010-12 May 2022) was conducted. Studies reporting the proportion of distant metastatic recurrence in women with non-metastatic breast cancer were identified and outcomes and characteristics were extracted.
JCO Oncol Pract
November 2024
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
J Clin Oncol
December 2024
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
. . , .
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJCO Glob Oncol
October 2024
Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
J Am Coll Radiol
November 2024
Specialty Chair, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Urothelial cancer is the second most common cancer, and cause of cancer death, related to the genitourinary tract. The goals of imaging for pretreatment staging of urothelial cancer are to evaluate for both local and distant spread of the cancer and assessing for synchronous sites of urothelial cancer in the upper tracts and bladder. For pretreatment staging of urothelial carcinoma, patients can be stratified into one of three groups: 1) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer; 2) muscle invasive bladder cancer; and 3) upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Dual anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade has improved the outcomes of patients with early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Here we present the final 10-year analysis of the ALTTO trial.
Patients And Methods: The ALTTO trial (NCT00490139) is a prospective randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study that investigated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab alone, in combination or sequentially with lapatinib.
JCO Glob Oncol
October 2024
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.
With the aim of improving the quality of cancer care globally, ASCO began to offer its quality improvement programs to interested international oncology practices. In this manuscript, we describe the experiences with ASCO quality initiatives in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The experience acquired from different practices in Latin America and Africa was reviewed and various action steps were summarized.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFmedRxiv
September 2024
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States of America.
Objective: Data extraction from the published literature is the most laborious step in conducting living systematic reviews (LSRs). We aim to build a generalizable, automated data extraction workflow leveraging large language models (LLMs) that mimics the real-world two-reviewer process.
Materials And Methods: A dataset of 10 clinical trials (22 publications) from a published LSR was used, focusing on 23 variables related to trial, population, and outcomes data.
J Clin Oncol
December 2024
UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA.
In 2012, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened a committee charged with addressing the quality of cancer care in the United States and providing recommendations to policymakers and the cancer care community on strategies to improve cancer care delivery from the time of diagnosis through end-of-life. The resulting committee report, titled (2013), presented a conceptual framework that included six interconnected components of care with corresponding recommendations. Over the past decade, the delivery of high-quality of cancer care has become more challenging and increasingly demanding on the workforce.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: In this study, we describe the geographic distribution of US cancer treatment trials to identify disparities and opportunities for targeted improvements in access to research for people with cancer.
Methods: US-based phase I-III cancer treatment trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov were tabulated for the years they were open to enrollment (2017-2022), overall and by county, and supplemented with data from the US Census Bureau, National Cancer Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and US Department of Agriculture.