This case series examines triple arthrodesis using articular cartilage excision without bone resection. Due to the technically demanding nature of triple arthrodesis, the authors present a nonresection technique with its perceived advantages over joint resection triple arthrodesis in the presence of reducible deformity, such as minimal shortening of bone, ease of execution, and better bony apposition. Fourteen patients with nonresection triple arthrodesis from two medical centers are included in this report. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months. Evaluation of results was performed subjectively and radiographically. There was a low incidence of nonunion (2% of joints) and minimal to no bone shortening (0.1 cm mean talonavicular shortening and 0.1 cm mean increase in talocalcaneal height). Mean time to fusion of joints fixed with screws was 9.91 weeks (SD = 3.61, n = 31), while fusion time for staple or pin fixation was 8.96 weeks (SD = 4.15, n = 10). There were no significant differences in time to fusion between screw and nonscrew fixation (p = .26) nor when comparing procedures within each patient (p = .30). At follow-up, five patients reported no pain at any time (36%); two patients reported mild occasional pain (14%). Moderate, daily pain was reported by seven patients (50%). While no direct comparison with resection triple arthrodesis was made, the positive subjective and objective results support this procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80026-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

triple arthrodesis
24
nonresection triple
8
resection triple
8
time fusion
8
patients reported
8
arthrodesis
6
triple
5
arthrodesis retrospective
4
retrospective analysis
4
analysis case
4

Similar Publications

Outcomes of triple arthrodesis with IOFIX type fixation: A prospective study.

Foot Ankle Surg

December 2024

Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Leuven, Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium. Electronic address:

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), radiological outcome and complications when performing a triple arthrodesis using the IOFIX system for the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints.

Methods: Data was collected prospectively. Twenty-nine consecutive patients were reviewed 1 year postoperative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: After the spine, the knee is the second most common location for skeletal tuberculosis. An unusual complication of tuberculosis infection is triple knee deformity. The combination of knee flexion, posterolateral tibial subluxation, and external tibial rotation over femoral condyles manifests as a severe deformity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Müller-Weiss is a disease characterized by deformation, fragmentation and necrosis of the navicular, which presents with midfoot varus and long-standing pain, mostly in females. It is related to delayed ossification due to physical or nutritional stress, associated with abnormal force distribution. There are still few studies on this condition and there is no consensus in the literature on its classification and treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Triple arthrodesis is commonly used to correct rigid progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). These patients often have associated first tarsometatarsal (TMT) instability on lateral weightbearing radiographs. It has not been well established if it is necessary to add first TMT arthrodesis to adequately correct the overall deformity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Osteolytic lesions in the spine can lead to instability, and different surgical methods aim to restore stability, but their biomechanical impacts are not well understood.
  • The study assessed the biomechanical effects of three surgical techniques for treating a T12 osteolytic lesion using finite element analysis, simulating real human spinal conditions.
  • Results showed that Model A had the least stress on the material but higher stress on instrumented vertebrae, while Model B was rigid with lower construct stress, and Model C had the lowest vertebral body stress but the highest screw pull-out stress, offering important insights for surgical decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!