18.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=9807537&retmode=xml&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b490818.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=health+promotion-health&datetype=edat&usehistory=y&retmax=5&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908
Objectives: This study assessed the effects of a 2-year integrated health promotion-health protection work-site intervention on changes in dietary habits and cigarette smoking.
Methods: A randomized, controlled intervention study used the work site as the unit of intervention and analysis; it included 24 predominantly manufacturing work sites in Massachusetts (250-2500 workers per site). Behaviors were assessed in self-administered surveys (n = 2386; completion rates = 61% at baseline, 62% at final). Three key intervention elements targeted health behavior change: (1) joint worker-management participation in program planning and implementation, (2) consultation with management on work-site environmental changes, and (3) health education programs.
Results: Significant differences between intervention and control work sites included reductions in the percentage of calories consumed as fat (2.3% vs 1.5% kcal) and increases in servings of fruit and vegetables (10% vs 4% increase). The intervention had a significant effect on fiber consumption among skilled and unskilled laborers. No significant effects were observed for smoking cessation.
Conclusions: Although the size of the effects of this intervention are modest, on a populationwide basis effects of this size could have a large impact on cancer-related and coronary heart disease end points.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508574 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.88.11.1685 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!