Objective: To compare two gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for down-regulation prior to superovulation in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer treatment.
Methods: Infertility patients (n=181) were randomized to receive buserelin (1200 microg/day, n=90) or nafarelin (800 microg/day, n=91) intranasally starting in the luteal phase. Serum levels of LH, estradiol and progesterone were measured during the treatment. The cycles were compared with regard to number of oocytes, fertilization and implantation rates and achieved pregnancies.
Results: Serum LH was lower after two weeks on buserelin: 1.8 (1.3-2.4) IU/L (median, with lower and upper quartile in parenthesis), than after nafarelin: 2.6 (1.8-4.0) IU/L, (p=0.0001). No other differences in serum hormone levels could be detected. More oocytes were recovered in the buserelin group: 13.0 (8.0-19.0) vs 11.0 (6.8-15.0), (p=0.046), but the fertilization rate was higher in the nafarelin group (49.9%, vs 45.1%, p=0.023). Implantation rate was higher in the nafarelin group (26.28% vs 15.5%, p=0.030), but there were an equal number of deliveries in both groups (20.9% vs 15.6% per started stimulation, p=0.420). In the subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles the implantation rate was 21.1% (nafarelin group) and 10.6% (buserelin group, p=0.067), the pregnancy rate/ET was 31.7% and 17.0% (p=0.107) and the delivery rate was 22.0% and 10.6% (p=0.148), respectively.
Conclusions: Differences exist in IVF-cycles down-regulated with buserelin or nafarelin which might affect embryo quality and treatment outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Reprod Biomed Online
March 2016
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
This preliminary study examined a possible effect of long duration repeated hormonal stimulation on the endometrium using a molecular tool. The expression of the hormone stimulated, cell cycle regulators, p27 and its ligase S-phase kinase-interacting protein2 (Skp2), were assessed in 46 endometrial samples of patients who underwent repeated IVF cycles (3-21). Skp2 protein is usually undetectable in normal tissue and can be demonstrated only in rapidly dividing cells.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Theor Biol
March 2013
Computational Systems Biology Group, Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB), Berlin, Germany.
The paper presents a differential equation model for the feedback mechanisms between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), development of follicles and corpus luteum, and the production of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), inhibin A (IhA), and inhibin B (IhB) during the female menstrual cycle. Compared to earlier human cycle models, there are three important differences: The model presented here (a) does not involve any delay equations, (b) is based on a deterministic modeling of the GnRH pulse pattern, and (c) contains less differential equations and less parameters. These differences allow for a faster simulation and parameter identification.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Tissue Res
December 2012
Clinic for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Andrology of Large and Small Animals, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.
To date, no details are available concerning the restart of steroidogenesis following the downregulation of testicular endocrine and germinative function by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist implants. This restart was assessed by determining the expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein, cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc) and cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase,17,20-lyase (P450c17). The re-establishment of steroidogenesis was initiated by the removal of the GnRH-agonist implant (18.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol
October 2012
Metrum Research Group LLC, Tariffville, Connecticut, USA.
Endometriosis is a gynecological condition resulting from proliferation of endometrial-like tissue outside the endometrial cavity. Estrogen suppression therapies, mediated through gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) modulation, decrease endometriotic implants and diminish associated pain albeit at the expense of bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Our goal was to provide model-based guidance for GnRH-modulating clinical programs intended for endometriosis management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!